43081j
commented
4 months ago qs has a pretty awkward/messy support for mixed syntax. i think it probably makes sense to bump major because of that
for example, stuff like foo.bar[baz][0] probably works in qs but is nonsense. it should be one syntax or the other, not a mixture (e.g. foo.bar.baz[0], or foo[bar][baz][0] but not both)
we should probably decide which syntax we want to support
picoquery has 3:
js(foo.bar[0])dot(foo.bar.0)index(foo[bar][0])
we should probably set it to js i think, though the tests right now assert against the index-style syntax
Migrates from qs to picoquery, a much faster library.
We can't use URLSearchParams since we support nested syntax (and therefore assert on the top level property)