Closed crcrpar closed 5 years ago
@knorth55 V5. Here is the reference: https://docs.chainer.org/en/stable/upgrade.html?highlight=upgrade#use-forward-instead-of-call-in-links.
pfnCI, test this please
Successfully created a job for commit f7b1368:
Please fix these errors.
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161407 STDOUT 2074] | def _predict(self, imgs):
-- | --
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161414 STDOUT 2074] | xs = chainer.Variable(self.xp.asarray(imgs))
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161421 STDOUT 2074] | with chainer.using_config('train', False):
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161427 STDOUT 2074] | > scores = F.softmax(self.forward(xs)).array
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161434 STDOUT 2074] | E AttributeError: Parameterized test failed.
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161440 STDOUT 2074] | E
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161448 STDOUT 2074] | E Base test method: TestPSPNetResNet.test_predict_gpu
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161455 STDOUT 2074] | E Test parameters:
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161486 STDOUT 2074] | E model: <class 'chainercv.experimental.links.model.pspnet.pspnet.PSPNetResNet50'>
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161524 STDOUT 2074] | E
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161533 STDOUT 2074] | E
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161539 STDOUT 2074] | E (caused by)
2019-03-18 11:10:02.161546 STDOUT 2074] | E AttributeError: 'PSPNetResNet101' object has no attribute 'forward'
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494948 STDOUT 2074] | self = <chainercv.experimental.links.model.pspnet.pspnet.PSPNetResNet50 object at 0x7f88b82a05d0>
-- | --
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494955 STDOUT 2074] | imgs = array([[[[ 0. , 0. , 0. , ..., 0. ,
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494962 STDOUT 2074] | ... , ..., 39.060997 ,
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494969 STDOUT 2074] | 128.061 , -56.939003 ]]]], dtype=float32)
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494975 STDOUT 2074] |
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494976 STDOUT 2074] | def _predict(self, imgs):
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494982 STDOUT 2074] | xs = chainer.Variable(self.xp.asarray(imgs))
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494988 STDOUT 2074] | with chainer.using_config('train', False):
2019-03-18 11:10:02.494994 STDOUT 2074] | > scores = F.softmax(self.forward(xs)).array
2019-03-18 11:10:02.495000 STDOUT 2074] | E AttributeError: Parameterized test failed.
2019-03-18 11:10:02.495006 STDOUT 2074] | E
2019-03-18 11:10:02.495012 STDOUT 2074] | E Base test method: TestPSPNetResNet.test_predict_gpu
2019-03-18 11:10:02.495018 STDOUT 2074] | E Test parameters:
2019-03-18 11:10:02.734602 STDOUT 2074] | E model: <class 'chainercv.experimental.links.model.pspnet.pspnet.PSPNetResNet50'>
2019-03-18 11:10:02.734638 STDOUT 2074] | E
2019-03-18 11:10:02.734648 STDOUT 2074] | E
2019-03-18 11:10:02.734656 STDOUT 2074] | E (caused by)
2019-03-18 11:10:02.734663 STDOUT 2074] | E AttributeError: 'PSPNetResNet50' object has no attribute 'forward'
I apologize to have missed chainercv/experimental/links and I'm working on them.
can you also modify FCIS
and Yolov2Tiny
in experimental
if possible?
Sorry. I had not checked this seriously.
Could you change chainercv.utils.testing.constant_stub_link.py
?
Also, could you change all TrainChains
in examples
?
pfnCI, test this please
Successfully created a job for commit 45624ca:
How do you think of the following items that contain __call__
?
*.rst
files
https://github.com/chainer/chainercv/blob/45624ca3badfb3d530a9726375fa4ff9df7c5ced/chainercv/utils/testing/constant_stub_link.py#L14-L15
https://github.com/chainer/chainercv/blame/45624ca3badfb3d530a9726375fa4ff9df7c5ced/examples/faster_rcnn/README.md#L16
I didn't change them because chainer.Link
and chainer.Chain
didn't include :meth:forward
in their documentation.
However, I noticed that other Link
s like L.Convolution2D
and Chain
s like ResNet50Layers
included :meth:forward
.
So, let me change them too.
*.rst
files still contain __call__
.
https://github.com/chainer/chainercv/blame/7af64e81012759314f7cff467bc19b350b7bcab7/docs/source/reference/links/faster_rcnn.rst#L26
Do you think it's better to remove all __call__
?
2019年3月22日(金) 13:26 Toru Ogawa notifications@github.com:
*.rst files still contain call.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/chainer/chainercv/pull/835#issuecomment-475489822, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APcP051MJ7rYosDtXfH2AqxVBCdvkxPAks5vZFtwgaJpZM4b4Jdy .
Since __call__
does not have its docstring and nothing is rendered, we should remove them.
LGTM
From which version can we use
forward
function?