While I believe we comply with the original DRL (v1.0 and v1.1), this v1.2 license doesn't separate
how attribution can be different between source code and match presentation:
While I imagine they had in mind source code attribution, we should aim for the strictest license interpretation, and ensure that we meet these requirements when presenting any matches:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) of the
Rules, provide a link to the project, and indicate if changes were made. You may
do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses
you or your use.
While we attribute authors, we don't yet provide links to the project. My thought is: add a RuleURL field. When we present results, we can then attribute it as:
by @mthcht (https://github.com/mthcht/ThreatHunting-Keywords-yara-rules)
Blocks #61
While I believe we comply with the original DRL (v1.0 and v1.1), this v1.2 license doesn't separate how attribution can be different between source code and match presentation:
https://github.com/mthcht/ThreatHunting-Keywords-yara-rules/blob/main/LICENSE
While I imagine they had in mind source code attribution, we should aim for the strictest license interpretation, and ensure that we meet these requirements when presenting any matches:
While we attribute authors, we don't yet provide links to the project. My thought is: add a RuleURL field. When we present results, we can then attribute it as:
by @mthcht (https://github.com/mthcht/ThreatHunting-Keywords-yara-rules)