Closed cpanato closed 1 year ago
Thanks Carlos! This is probably a dumb idea, but could we skip the labels.json and just use the labels on this ,github repo to be the authoratative source?
i think we can, but then we will not have the audit part in case we need it (who knows 🤷♂️ ) and will make hard to know who change what/when
but i can implement that in a follow up if you would like/want
Nah this is good. Thanks again!
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 9:02 AM Carlos Tadeu Panato Junior < @.***> wrote:
Thanks Carlos! This is probably a dumb idea, but could we skip the labels.json and just use the labels on this ,github repo to be the authoratative source?
i think we can, but then we will not have the audit part in case we need it (who knows 🤷♂️ ) and will make hard to know who change what/when
but i can implement that in a follow up if you would like/want
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/chainguard-images/.github/pull/8#issuecomment-1302069791, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB37SHOQ3BQBWFXZ5NKKDJDWGOZWBANCNFSM6AAAAAARVGQY3M . You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: @.***>
will merge to test this