Makefile is borked and should be replaced by setup.py

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. run make 

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The expected output is something that builds and installs pydelicious.
Instead I get a bunch of errors. 

In fact, I'm not sure a Makefile is needed at all given that most python
modules use setup.py to do what the makefile is trying to do. Thoughts and
discussion are welcomed.

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.
makefile

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dfdes...@gmail.com on 5 Oct 2007 at 3:21

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The makefile can go. It is there to generate some docs (using docutils) and 
some stuff I though convenient. I understand its presence is confusing.

I will look into setup.py and how to use it properly. Hopefully i can move 
targets `doc` and `test` into it, as well as an `install`

Original comment by berend.v...@gmail.com on 5 Oct 2007 at 9:12

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Just fixed the makefile and hope to upload it in a few hours.

Since setup.py does not seem capable of other targets (without extending 
setuptools)
I think the Makefile has some added benefits and I would like to let it stay.

I made it more informative (ie. that its not needed to install, etc.) I hope 
thats
enough to stop it from confusing people.

mvrgr, Berend

Original comment by berend.v...@gmail.com on 15 Oct 2007 at 3:53

• Added labels: Type-Other
• Removed labels: Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by berend.v...@gmail.com on 7 Nov 2007 at 8:56

• Changed state: Fixed