Considering that there is (probably) no auto-completion of options and that we want chash to be a helpful tool to act quickly on things, I would suggest shortening up the "database" word in commands to "db", which is pretty understandable by anyone.
Also, the documentation (front page of Github project) seems to imply that it should be calle as "chash database database:sql" (two times "database")...
And finally, database:sql isn't really expressive. I prefered the previous "cli", which goes for "command line interface", or could even be understood as "client", which is more correct than "sql" (Structured Query Language), as it provides access to an sql client (as opposed to starting a new server, showing sql connection configuration, and that kind of stuff).
jmontoyaa
commented
11 years ago
Considering that there is (probably) no auto-completion of options and that we want chash to be a helpful tool to act quickly on things, I would suggest shortening up the "database" word in commands to "db", which is pretty understandable by anyone.
Also, the documentation (front page of Github project) seems to imply that it should be calle as "chash database database:sql" (two times "database")... And finally, database:sql isn't really expressive. I prefered the previous "cli", which goes for "command line interface", or could even be understood as "client", which is more correct than "sql" (Structured Query Language), as it provides access to an sql client (as opposed to starting a new server, showing sql connection configuration, and that kind of stuff).