Closed iangreenleaf closed 11 years ago
Hey @iangreenleaf, sorry for the holdup. I'm working on a 2.0 branch and I'll decide if this is a good fit when I have a stable 2.0 base to determine what features to include, should be soonish :)
Still not sure if we really need this. Feel free to re-open when #18 is implemented.
I wanted a more visible set of matchers for the common task of testing against a subset of a hash. It's doable with the "strictness" setting, but I found that one a little obscure and difficult to discover. Hopefully you like this new version.
I didn't write any documentation - I figured you could decide how you wanted to organize it, if you decide to pull this feature.