Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Hi Dale have done a grab of the messages for you, you get 6 boxes plus the main
message
Cheers
Stu
Original comment by stuboy...@googlemail.com
on 7 Feb 2009 at 11:42
Attachments:
Just had this message, after getting the message attached.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "currentcost.py", line 666, in onConnect
File "currentcost.py", line 1404, in getDataFromCurrentCostMeter
AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'startswith'
hope it helps :-)
Stu
Original comment by stuboy...@googlemail.com
on 21 Feb 2009 at 6:01
Attachments:
Thought I'd add this graph, it shows current cost usiong 100% of one of my CPU
cores
every 6secs? on reading live data. Might be connected with crashes perhaps?
Regards
Original comment by stuboy...@googlemail.com
on 6 Mar 2009 at 3:54
Attachments:
here's a graph when the app first starts live graphing as you can see peak load
on
cpu is only 10%
Original comment by stuboy...@googlemail.com
on 6 Mar 2009 at 5:22
Attachments:
When an update is received from a CurrentCost meter, the live graph is redrawn
See
<http://code.google.com/p/currentcostgui/source/browse/trunk/currentcostlivedata
.py?r=140#288>
The graphs are redrawn (see
<http://code.google.com/p/currentcostgui/source/browse/trunk/currentcostlivedata
.py?r=140#102>)
using plot_date (see
<http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/api/axes_api.html?highlight=plot_date#matplot
lib.axes.Axes.plot_date>),
giving it the complete set of live data for plotting.
I'm not sure how this works, internally - but if you're seeing significantly
increasing CPU usage over time, I'm thinking it might not be adding a new single
point, but perhaps redrawing the whole graph from scratch. In which case, the
larger
the data set gets each time, the bigger the task involved in redrawing the live
graph.
I'll have a look and see if there is a more efficient approach for realtime
graphing
in matplotlib, other than plot_date followed by draw.
(Any suggestions for how to do this would be very welcome - either posted here
as a
comment, or submitted as a code change!)
Original comment by dale.l...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2009 at 5:43
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
stuboy...@googlemail.com
on 4 Feb 2009 at 5:48