Closed CHELSEA234 closed 4 years ago
Here is more complete comparison between my questionable reproduction and your published results:
I hope you could give me some hints at this, really appreciate your help!
Can you share your save checkpoint file?
Hi Xiao Guo, Sorry for the late reply. I don't have the original checkpoint file. But I trained my model just now and reached an average error of 1.77 after training for 24000 iterations . I can sent you the checkpoint file if you need. Or you can train more than 20000 iterations(30000 for example) by yourself and choose the best one, which i think can reach a similar average result.
Hello @chaneyddtt , I will try to follow the steps you mentioned for the number of iterations. Could you upload the checkpoint file somewhere or send link to the uploaded version?
Hi @zaverichintan, I upload the model here. Please note that I trained the network again and the result for each action may be slightly different, but the overall average is the same.
Do I need to run the training once to generate the sample folder? I have to copy the files you provided and copy them to a folder called Model? And then to how to run the AC_main.py with the new model?
Yes, or you can just put the model somewhere you like and specify the path in the AC_main.py. Note that you also have to specify the 'checkpoint' to keep consistent, for example 24000 for the provided model. Then you specify the 'is_sampling' as 'True' before you run the AC_main.py.
It throws the error:
ValueError: Dimensions must be equal, but are 54 and 70 for 'VAESkeleton/add_1' (op: 'Add') with input shapes: [?,1,54,1], [?,1,70,1].
Do you set the parameter ''--dataset" to cmu? Because the input dimension is 70 for the cmu dataset, while it is 54 for the human3.6m.
Is it possible to get the checkpoint for the Human3.6m dataset, and run the testing on it?
Yes, the checkpoint I provide is for the human3.6m dataset. Did you set the 'whole_sample_dim' in the Autoenc_gan to [None,50+args.output_length,54,1]. The input dimension should be 54 for the human3.6m dataset.
Now it's running without any errors. Thanks
Hi,
I downloaded your code and ran it on my local, and I did averaging over 3 times experiment printing results. I got some numerical values (Fig1), acceptable yet still worse than ones in your paper (Fig2), can you tell me where I made mistakes? BTW, in figure 1, the every row's last value means mean error of all 25 frames.
Best, Xiao Guo