Add one more CSS level argument (just like minimize=boolean) to specify the order.

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

Consider you have two groups (A and B) ... and A includes group B. Both A and B 
groups have the css asset (say something.css) included in them. It would be 
nice to have a css tag level attribute where we can specify that one takes 
precedence over the other... Or even better .... if another css exists with the 
same name in the same location in the included group, dont include it in the 
combined css asset. This will help in avoiding redundant css entries and css 
cascading issues when properly marked with this new attribute.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

1.4.8.1-RELEASE

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dinakar....@ihg.com on 27 Aug 2012 at 5:18

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This is already performed. If a group defines two identical resources, only the 
first one is used, the second is discarded. Do you have an example which proves 
the opposite?

Original comment by alex.obj...@gmail.com on 27 Aug 2012 at 5:35

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I didnt know it already existed. Thanks for the update.

Original comment by dinakar....@ihg.com on 27 Aug 2012 at 6:00

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by alex.obj...@gmail.com on 27 Aug 2012 at 6:02

• Changed state: Invalid