Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
The list of vulnerable tests from net_unittests:
FileStreamTest.*Async*
HostResolverImplTest.*
TestCompletionCallbackTest.Simple
FtpNetworkTransactionTest.*
HttpNetworkLayerTest.GET
HttpNetworkLayerTest.SimpleGET
HttpNetworkTransactionTest.*
ProxyScriptFetcherTest.*
SOCKS5ClientSocketTest.*
SOCKSClientSocketTest.*
TCPClientSocketPoolTest.*
URLRequestTest.*
URLRequestTestHTTP.*
URLRequestTestFTP.*
SSLClientSocketTest.*
DiskCacheTest.*
DiskCacheEntryTest.*Async*
DiskCacheEntryTest.DoomSparseEntry
and from base_unittests:
WorkerPoolTest.PostTask
The "aspacem" warnings can be observed under ThreadSanitizer r1102 (Valgrind
r10454,
VEX r1908)
Original comment by ramosian.glider@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2009 at 1:26
A new aspacem reporter in net_unittests is FlipNetworkTransactionTest.Connect
Original comment by ramosian.glider@gmail.com
on 13 Oct 2009 at 6:48
net_unittests again: DiskCacheEntryTest.CancelSparseIO
Original comment by ramosian.glider@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2009 at 5:37
and once more: FlipNetworkTransactionTest.ResponseWithoutSynReply
Original comment by ramosian.glider@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2009 at 11:44
This bug conforms to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216837, which turns
out to
be some VEX problem probably unrelated to address space manager.
ThreadSanitizer built using:
make -j8 CXXFLAGS+="-DDEBUG=1 -DTS_INSTR_VALGRIND_HERE=1 "
crashes on a debug assertion in VgTidToTsTid(). This could be worked around
using the
attached patch, but the hack leads to false positives.
Original comment by gli...@google.com
on 8 Dec 2009 at 11:09
Attachments:
Alex, would you please add the related reg test to our suite?
Original comment by konstant...@gmail.com
on 20 Jan 2010 at 10:08
unit_tests: DnsMasterTest.* and URLFetcher*Test.*
Original comment by gli...@chromium.org
on 3 Mar 2010 at 12:31
Kostya, the corresponding test in racecheck_unittest is called
MacTests.DISABLED_WqthreadRegressionTest.
Original comment by gli...@chromium.org
on 3 Mar 2010 at 12:32
A rough fix is available as of r1842.
Original comment by gli...@chromium.org
on 15 Mar 2010 at 4:52
Is it fixed or worked around?
Can we close the issue?
Original comment by timurrrr
on 27 May 2010 at 8:18
Original comment by ramosian.glider@gmail.com
on 27 May 2010 at 8:46
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ramosian.glider@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2009 at 3:30