The goal of this ticket is to work closely with Tiledb to produce a design for "shape/reshape" feature for Tiledb-SOMA that is easy to use, consistent in semantics and performant in operations. Specifically, we want to ensure that the feature won't introduce any problems in Census or Census-Spatial.
Part of the collaboration might involve writing some prototyping code from a client perspective (users of Tiledb-Soma) such that the API are consistent (ex: API for denseNDArray and sparseNDArray behave as expected) and performant.
For context, here are some older issues and design docs to give an idea of the complexity and surface area affected by this proposal:
pablo-gar
commented
2 months ago
Description
The current proposal for this feature is tracked in this document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lzJrdozpvHTrAyL5ccz8v-OBkf6MK3x1lAQeYnmJkeM/edit
The goal of this ticket is to work closely with Tiledb to produce a design for "shape/reshape" feature for
Tiledb-SOMAthat is easy to use, consistent in semantics and performant in operations. Specifically, we want to ensure that the feature won't introduce any problems in Census or Census-Spatial.Part of the collaboration might involve writing some prototyping code from a client perspective (users of
Tiledb-Soma) such that the API are consistent (ex: API for denseNDArray and sparseNDArray behave as expected) and performant.For context, here are some older issues and design docs to give an idea of the complexity and surface area affected by this proposal: