Closed signechambers1 closed 1 year ago
@signechambers1
What should the behavior be when tissues aren't expanded for the CSV output?
Currently:
Should it instead be something like this?
When tissue is expanded:
Note the aggregate
@signechambers1 not sure if Andrew's question above was resolved already 😄 Thank you!
Following in the repro steps above gets me aggregated tissues in CSV, since we haven't expanded any of the tissue rows. So I think it is expected that there's no cellType row present
However, I think Andrew's suggestion makes sense to replace tissue name in the cellType column with "aggregated"
Concretely:
Without expanded tissues:
With expanded tissues, thus showing cell types:
@signechambers1 what do you think?
Thank you!
@tihuan yes! let's make the cell type "aggregate" to reduce confusion as you have shown. Thank you!
Awesome thanks, @signechambers1 !
Does this look good? If so, I'll start a PR thank you!
Expanded:
Not expanded:
@tihuan perfect!
Ayy sweet ok will send out a PR tomorrow morning! Thanks, Signe!!
Steps to reproduce:
Cell type column should show celltype name.