[cloc] Fix cloc error due to mulitple word language-name

[inishchith]

@valeriocos As I was working on large repository evaluation(https://github.com/inishchith/gsoc-graal/issues/12#issuecomment-513395968), enter this error in logic under cloc analyzer which depends on reporting of results based on position in the list.

• For instance, in the following example 3rd element:
  1. represents number of blank lines (int)
  2. here it's part of language name (str)

     i. ['YAML', '1', '3', '0', '16']
     ii. ['Bourne', 'Again', 'Shell', '1', '13', '18', '105']   <--------- Error

This PR fixes the error by picking the elements from the last(right to left). Please let me know what you think :)

Signed-off-by: inishchith inishchith@gmail.com

[inishchith]

@valeriocos

Could you increase the version number of the cloc analyzer?

Sure. Done!

It would be possible to add some assertions to the existing tests (test_cloc.py) to be sure we are correctly parsing blanks, comments and loc?

It's possible by implementing the same logic at the test side. I'll add it, Please let me know if there's a better way of doing it.

Thanks!

[valeriocos]

Sure. Done!

Thanks

It's possible by implementing the same logic at the test side. I'll add it, Please let me know if there's a better way of doing it.

I apologize for being unclear. I meant to do something like:

    def test_analyze(self):
        """Test whether cloc returns the expected fields data"""

        cloc = Cloc()
        kwargs = {'file_path': os.path.join(self.data_path, ANALYZER_TEST_FILE)}
        result = cloc.analyze(**kwargs)

        self.assertIn('blanks', result)
        self.assertTrue(type(result['blanks']), int)
        self.assertTrue(result['blanks'], 27) <--
        self.assertIn('comments', result)
        self.assertTrue(type(result['comments']), int)
        self.assertTrue(result['comments'], 31) <--
        self.assertIn('loc', result)
        self.assertTrue(type(result['loc']), int)
        self.assertTrue(result['loc'], 67) <--

[inishchith]

@valeriocos No worries. Thanks for the clarification! I've made the changes.