Project Recommendability (previously Contributor Recommendability)

sgoggins commented 2 years ago

This issue is created to collect comments about the rolling release of "__"

This metric can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P-Xf2tdXEwg9FH6hANet68paUzadvahI3dW4IGuxk0g/edit#heading=h.wmfp9nxbbdwc

Once pull request #176 is merged this link will not work https://github.com/chaoss/wg-value/blob/main/focus-areas/communal-value/contributor-recommendability.md instead the following link will work https://github.com/chaoss/wg-value/blob/main/focus-areas/communal-value/project-recommendability.md

Note: This metric is being developed using a Google Doc, and the "Convert to Markdown" add on.

See all release candidates: https://chaoss.community/metrics/

CHAOSS Metric Quality Checklist

This checklist is used for new and updated metrics to ensure we follow CHAOSS quality standards and processes. Below checklist items don’t have to be completed all at once: create the metric release candidate issue first and then start working on the checklist.

Process

[x] Create the “review issue” in the authoring WG’s repo for comments during review period and paste this template in
[x] Create pull request to edit or add metric to WG’s repo (after checking Content Quality and Technical Requirements below)
[x] Add the new metric or metric edit to release notes issue in working group repo
[x] Update the Metrics Spreadsheet
[x] Create issue in CHAOSS/Translations repository to kick-off translation to other languages (please use the the translation issue template)
[x] "Metric Candidate Release" label added to the metric release candidate issue.
[ ] Metric was added to website

When above steps are completed:

[ ] Announce new/updated metric on mailing list, newsletter, community Zoom call, and Twitter. This can be coordinated with the community manager.

Content Quality

[x] Required headings are filled in, including Questions.
[x] Description provides context to metric
[x] Objectives list sample uses for the metric and desired outcomes
[x] If any, DEI uses of the metric are included Objectives
[x] Optional headings that have no content were removed
[x] Contributors section lists those contributors that want to be named
[x] The name of the metric is the same in (1) metric heading, (2) metric file name, (3) focus area, (4) metrics spreadsheet, (5) “review issue”, (6) translation issue, and (7) website

Technical Requirements

[x] Message in the metric markdown file that the metric will be part of the next regular release is at top of page and the links are correct (this is in the metric template)
[x] Metric file name is the full metric name and only contains lower case letters and hyphens (“-”) for spaces
[x] Images are included using markdown and relative links (as described in the metrics template)
[x] Images have at least one empty line above and below them
[x] Ensure images are placed in image folder and followed naming convention
[x] If new focus area is created, ensure focus area is added to wg repo readme and focus area folder readme
[x] Within the focus area, add the metric in the table and provide the link to the metric and metric question
[x] Ensure tables within metric are converted as image and placed in the image folder (both original MD and screenshotted PNG format) and follow the naming convention
[x] No HTML code in the metrics markdown file

vinodkahuja commented 2 years ago

@sgoggins Is this part of the current release or next release.

GeorgLink commented 2 years ago

@sgoggins Is this part of the current release or next release.

This metric was submitted after the metric freeze and should be considered for the next release: 2022-03.

vinodkahuja commented 2 years ago

We will work on this in our upcoming meetings

klumb commented 2 years ago

The name of this metric is inaccurate. It should be Project Recommendability. Although, recommendability, in general, is a difficult word for a metric title so I would re think it.

vinodkahuja commented 2 years ago

@klumb name is correct. here is the correct link to the document finalized in last value working group meeting.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NIUIBGHJDwhht9lXt66uoSP4CfKvD4AHwEsVa4bDKZE/edit

vinodkahuja commented 2 years ago

@klumb I thought you are saying the name is incorrect in the document. After rereading your comment, I assume you are proposing the new name i.e. Project Recommendability. We can consider that and discuss it in our upcoming value meeting.

klumb commented 2 years ago

@klumb I thought you are saying the name is incorrect in the document. After rereading your comment, I assume you are proposing the new name i.e. Project Recommendability. We can consider that and discuss it in our upcoming value meeting.

Yes, I think this metric really needs a new name.

klumb commented 2 years ago

Please create an issue for this metric in the translations repo

germonprez commented 2 years ago

@vinodkahuja could you do this?

vinodkahuja commented 2 years ago

Translation request done

rpaik commented 2 years ago

The name of the metrics is a bit misleading to me. When I first read it, I thought it was to rate the contributor (or a community member). But it sounds like to to rate a project or community?

vinodkahuja commented 2 years ago

@klumb I have updated the name through pull request #176. Once you merge it please update the website link and let me know and I will create the request in the translation repo.

eyehwan commented 2 years ago

I have updated translation.

germonprez commented 2 years ago

This metric is ready for release.

chaoss / wg-value