chaotic-aur / packages

The packages Mason, what do they mean? (Package requests and bug reports here) 📑
https://aur.chaotic.cx
326 stars 20 forks source link

[Request] glrnvim #2238

Closed REmerald closed 1 year ago

REmerald commented 1 year ago

Link to the package base(s) in the AUR

glrnvim

Utility this package has for you

(https://github.com/beeender/glrnvim)
The best alternative to the other neovim frontends (at least in the repos/chaotic):

Do you consider the package(s) to be useful for every Chaotic-AUR user?

No, but for a great amount.

Do you consider the package to be useful for feature testing/preview?

Have you tested if the package builds in a clean chroot?

Does the package's license allow redistributing it?

YES!

Have you searched the issues to ensure this request is unique?

Have you read the README to ensure this package is not banned?

More information

No response

Technetium1 commented 1 year ago

@REmerald Just to be clear, goneovim-bin is nonfunctional [AUR-side problem], and should be removed?

REmerald commented 1 year ago

goneovim-bin is nonfunctional [AUR-side problem]

I meant if you install the missing library chaotic-aur/libtiff5 (not present in the goneovim-bin package dependencies), it will launch and "work", but with some issues:

goneovim: /usr/lib/libtiff.so.5: no version information available (required by goneovim)
/usr/bin/goneovim: /usr/lib/libtiff.so.5: no version information available (required by /usr/bin/goneovim)
open /home/remorin/.goneovim/setting.toml: no such file or directory
qt.qpa.wayland: Failed to load client buffer integration: "wayland-egl"
qt.qpa.wayland: Available client buffer integrations: ()

And I also noticed it displays some of the glyphs wrong. Maybe it has more, I didn't test it, just lauched it with a custom neovim config.

should be removed?

I am not an expert, so I don't really know what's the right decision.

If you ask my opinion, I agree that this package is broken/unfunctional. It should at least be updated to use libtiff.so.6 from libtiff instead of libtiff.so.5 from libtiff5. The project seems to relatively active though.
Btw, if you will decide to not remove it, it'll be a good idea to rename it from goneovim-bin to just goneovim, to make the packages less confusing, because this's not AUR anymore, everything here is a binary.

Just to be clear

So, everything else ok, especially glrnvim?