Closed Gontier-Julien closed 1 year ago
i don't know why it was setup that way (and i think there was a very good reason behind it, so clear me up if i'm wrong).
Actually, neither @thotypous nor I was aware of the existence of the base-devel image when we ported it to singularity.
Feel free to open a PR to keep your credits.
i don't know why it was setup that way (and i think there was a very good reason behind it, so clear me up if i'm wrong).
Actually, neither @thotypous nor I was aware of the existence of the base-devel image when we ported it to singularity.
Feel free to open a PR to keep your credits.
Alright doing that right now!
I propose some change on the
Singularity
file for the toolbox, i don't know why it was setup that way (and i think there was a very good reason behind it, so clear me up if i'm wrong). But since it in a clean docker anyway, there shouldn't be any issues to go directly grab the base-devel docker container. And with that we could remove the pacman line to go grab it.From: gitlab.archlinux.org:5050/archlinux/archlinux-docker:base-master
pacman -Syyu --noconfirm --noprogressbar --quiet
pacman -S --noconfirm --noprogressbar --quiet base base-devel
to
From: gitlab.archlinux.org:5050/archlinux/archlinux-docker:base-devel
pacman -Syyu --noconfirm --noprogressbar --quiet