here, I opted to simply omit workflows from the Client.workflows list output as opposed to building a null-flavored version of the original object – I can see benefits to the above approach, but ultimately in my use case, it seems data referencing now-deleted code can be safely ignored.
I realize now that I ran into the same issue this pr aims to fix for the CLI, https://github.com/chaps-io/gush/pull/72
here, I opted to simply omit workflows from the
Client.workflowslist output as opposed to building a null-flavored version of the original object – I can see benefits to the above approach, but ultimately in my use case, it seems data referencing now-deleted code can be safely ignored.