Closed ghislainbourgeois closed 6 months ago
@ghislainbourgeois I came here to do exactly the same thing and found you'd already done it. We need to build the js though and commit into the repo. See the contributors guide
Let's get this done ASAP!
@addyess I just pushed the commit. I had to use the environment variable that I found in #55 for things to build however.
@addyess I just pushed the commit. I had to use the environment variable that I found in #55 for things to build however.
💯 That's the one
@addyess I just pushed the commit. I had to use the environment variable that I found in #55 for things to build however.
💯 That's the one
@ghislainbourgeois
Okay yeah... Lemme look at this in the morning. Juju-bundle and juju-crashdump are gonna complain too. They are pinned to the amd64 versions too for security bc using a channel can present a security issue
closing in favor of #79
This changes the action to install
jq
from the apt repository instead of a snap, to enable the action to work onarm64
.The action currently installs
jq
from a specific snap revision that only exists foramd64
. There is ajq
deb in main; it is supported on more architectures and is more up to date.The snap also exists for
arm64
, but we would have to track thelatest/stable
track. This could change more often than the deb package, which is why I propose this change with the deb instead.