being able to set +b *a!*@* after you've set +b *?a!*@* but not the reverse assumes that humans will always add bans in order of widening scope, whereas adding a subset ban of an active superset ban with the intent to later remove the superset and not the subset makes a lot of sense, and I am sure there are other examples
being able to set
+b *a!*@*
after you've set+b *?a!*@*
but not the reverse assumes that humans will always add bans in order of widening scope, whereas adding a subset ban of an active superset ban with the intent to later remove the superset and not the subset makes a lot of sense, and I am sure there are other examples