Closed marotbone closed 2 years ago
Greetings, Maro!
Thanks very much for using SNPGenie and for the question. Looking at your sites_results.txt file, indeed it is odd. I ran the data for myself, and the site_results.txt looks correct (or at least, not odd):
It is possible (likely) this is a bug from an older version. Can you download the latest SNPGenie from this repository and try it again?
Let me know! Chase
Hi Chase,
Thanks for the support. The strange behavior was caused by the equal sign in the command to pass the fastafile. I am sorry for wasting your time.
Great tool, it seems to perfectly match our needs. Thank you!
Best, Maro
How odd! I'm glad the solution was simple. Please let me know if anything else comes up!
Many thanks, Chase
Hi,
I'm using SNPGenie on bacterial data of pooled samples with very low frequent SNPs which I called with lofreq.
I am using SNPGenie Version: 2019.10.31 with the following command:
snpgenie.pl --fastafile=PsymA.fasta --gtffile PsymA_cds.gtf --snpreport PsymA_recode.vcf --vcfformat=2
In my opinion this seems to be the most appropriate option for my case. All works fine so far, but when I check
site_results.txt
all the sites are classified as synonymous and some columns seem to be missing (e.g ref_nt and codon).Here is a ZIP file with the input files and the generated output folder. PsymA_test.zip
What could be the reason for this?
Thanks.
Best, Maro