chaynes2019 / AvidaGeneDupe

0 stars 2 forks source link

Figure: something having to do with robustness (?) #9

Open mmore500 opened 1 month ago

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

in the beginning part of the run, you see an accumulation of coding sites which means that your robustness is going down; gene duplications causing direct task acquisition, but in the last few tasks it seems a lot more like fine tuning; is this a bi-phasic process where the second part the more traditional duplication and divergence and the extra material; and there is selection for simplicity with the number of coding sites going down

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

untitled

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

untitled(1)

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

untitled(2)

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

image

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

image

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

image image image

Need to check for sign mistake or other bug: the coding site deltas from having zero tasks to having >=1 task should only be positive. Right now, they are all zero for the slip insertion mask being False and there are only three nonzero for the slip duplicate being true

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

Possible interpretation: the num tasks has is the number of tasks that you end up with, not the number that you start out with

mmore500 commented 1 month ago

Try tweaking this to not double count the same site over multiple tasks

df = df.with_columns(
    pl.col("Is Task Coding Site Delta").sum().over(
        ["Treatment", "Run ID", "Generation Born"],
    )
    .alias("is task coding site delta sum"),
)
mmore500 commented 1 month ago

Are the slip mutations increasing coding sites for large number of tasks due to them causing gain of entirely new tasks?

mmore500 commented 1 month ago