Many of the prints were too small

[DefProc]

When the hands were generated, they were mainly taken from the affected hand, cross-knuckle measurement; except where the user had very similar affected knuckle and affected-side wrist measurements when the size was chosen to be closer to the unaffected cross-knuckle dimension.

As I understand, many of the undersized prints were where the wrist joint of the Raptor was too small for the user. By including affected wrist size in the scale_hand script, the wrist size could be used as a lower limit for sizing (once the default distance is checked).

Including input for the affected and non-affected cross-knuckle measurements would mean neither would be mixed up, and that the generated models would all use the same criteria.

[DefProc]

so that plan is to:

• take the affected knuckle measurement as the main input,
• ask for the affected wrist measurement too,
• check that the (affected knuckle measurement)/(knuckle to wrist ratio) > (affected wrist measurement)
• if it's not, warn that the output model may be too small in the wrist, and suggest a minimum knuckle measurement to use ( (affected wrist) × (knuckle to wrist ratio) )
• allow the user to choose to continue (unless -f is used)

Where "knuckle to wrist ratio" is the (cross knuckle distance)/(cross wrist distance) from the unit size CAD model.

For clarity, the script should also ask explicitly for the "affected" knuckle and wrist measurments.