Closed shikharish closed 5 months ago
Attention: 102 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
9aa0386
) 78.85% compared to head (fd1ee62
) 78.67%. Report is 11 commits behind head on main.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
internal/json.go | 66.66% | 58 Missing and 20 partials :warning: |
internal/utils.go | 66.00% | 12 Missing and 5 partials :warning: |
cmd/memparse.go | 90.41% | 4 Missing and 3 partials :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
49 tests ±0 49 :white_check_mark: ±0 1s :stopwatch: ±0s 1 suites ±0 0 :zzz: ±0 1 files ±0 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit fd1ee62a. ± Comparison against base commit 311918ee.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
@snprajwal @adrianreber Any reviews?
@shikharish can you please squash all the commits into a single one? The first commit not being signed-off triggers the DCO failure. It would also be helpful to rename the PR to something like refactor: split commands into separate package
Done. @snprajwal
@snprajwal Any more reviews?
@rst0git @adrianreber PTAL
Also, @shikharish you would have to rebase this branch against the main branch of the repo, some commits have been added in the past week
@shikharish Would you be able to add a git commit message describing what changes have been made? It would make it much easier to review ;-)
@rst0git I have squashed all commits into one. I believe you can see that one with all commit messages. Should I make a more detailed commit message?
Should I make a more detailed commit message?
@shikharish It is a good practice to do that. The following contributing guidelines and blog post provide more information:
@rst0git Updated commit message. I hope this is better. Thank you for the informative resources.
Looks good indeed. All tests look happy.
Closes #80.