Closed snprajwal closed 12 months ago
Patch coverage: 85.61
% and project coverage change: +2.17
:tada:
Comparison is base (
69a4966
) 80.00% compared to head (6a534c5
) 82.17%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
36 tests +3 36 :heavy_check_mark: +3 0s :stopwatch: ±0s 1 suites ±0 0 :zzz: ±0 1 files ±0 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit 064f017b. ± Comparison against base commit 5a00d397.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
The binary size check does not seem to work any more. I just see one run of it. No comparison.
Can you add an example of what this looks like in the PR description?
The binary size workflow should be working now, I rebased this branch against main.
I forgot to do a nil pointer check while searching for the process node in the tree. Updated the commit with those changes now.
The file descriptors opened by the processes in the checkpoint can now be viewed with the
--fds
flag. This currently displays the file type, FD, and the path.An example output for a checkpoint of httpd container (provided by @rst0git):