What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Dynamically create a view that contains an ImageMap
2. Call a function to recursively remove all the children in the view
3. sometimes there is an exception in ImageMap.as
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Exception shouldn't be thrown
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Flexlib 2.4, Windows XP
Please provide any additional information below.
I have written a function which given a DisplayObjectContainer recursively
removes all the children. When I apply that function to a view which has
ImageMap sometimes I get an exception in ImageMap.as
ArgumentError: Error #2025: The supplied DisplayObject must be a child of
the caller.
at flash.display::DisplayObjectContainer/setChildIndex()
at mx.core::UIComponent/setChildIndex()
[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:4936
]
at flexlib.controls::ImageMap/updateDisplayList()
[C:\projects\Flex\ClientFI2\ClientFI\src\flexlib\controls\ImageMap.as:324]
at mx.core::UIComponent/validateDisplayList()
[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:6214
]
at mx.managers::LayoutManager/validateDisplayList()
[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\managers\LayoutManager.a
s:602]
at mx.managers::LayoutManager/doPhasedInstantiation()
[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\managers\LayoutManager.a
s:657]
at Function/http://adobe.com/AS3/2006/builtin::apply()
at mx.core::UIComponent/callLaterDispatcher2()
[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:8460
]
at mx.core::UIComponent/callLaterDispatcher()
[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:8403
]
I made a small change in updateDisplayList function to check if ImageMap
contains areaHolder then setChildIndex:
if (this.contains(areaHolder)) //New line added, check if child exists
{
setChildIndex(areaHolder, numChildren - 1);
}
Original issue reported on code.google.com by raghu.k...@gmail.com on 18 Aug 2009 at 6:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
raghu.k...@gmail.com
on 18 Aug 2009 at 6:59