acrmp
commented
11 years ago Hi Scott,
Introspecting Chef to find the available resources your version of Chef supports is a great idea, and something I've also been considering for chefspec to remove a lot of boilerplate in that project.
One slight complication for minitest-chef-handler is that it was a conscious decision not to implement matchers for resources that extend File (see this comment) and it would be good to preserve that behaviour.
We also treat a couple of resources differently because they need more than just the resource name in order to #load_current_resource. Again we could special case those.
For people that use the MiniTest::Spec syntax we'd also want to think about adding infections perhaps based on parent class.
The only downside I can see is that the code may become slightly harder to follow.
Cheers,
Andrew.
I was wanting to use the gem_package resource because the package resource doesn't work for gems installed and I was rudely woken up to our static list of resources we register.
cron directory file group link package service and user are covered but it omits gem_package and other resources that may come up in the future.
It's easy to register gem_package but that feels wrong.
Thanks!