Closed lpatiny closed 2 years ago
@lpatiny do you mean it is missing?
Ok well possible. If the parser can read the generated jcamp and you recover the same number of points it should be ok.
It could also check that the parsed values are similar. Easy to make a mistake with those factors.
@lpatiny, do you know if it applies only for DIFDUP or we could generalize it?
also, it could be applied for 2D NMR variables, in this part of code?
Based on this publication: http://old.iupac.org/jcamp/protocols/dxir01.pdf
Based on this publication: http://www.jcamp-dx.org/protocols/dxnmr01.pdf
This is also quite interesting
Even if today I would rather consider 224 and not 216 as range.
@jobo322 please close this issue if you think it is ok.
It is included directly in the encoder. I will create a new ticket for recommended ordinate scaling
there is a trick when you are using difdup compression about the last point that needs to be repeated on the next line. Not sure it was calculated here and you should check the specifications.