Inclusion in other GPL software

[GoogleCodeExporter]

again:proposal:

I believe that your piece of software has reached usability. It is time to
include it into software that is largely-used.
I will include it into one of the most complex components for Joomla. Fabrik.
Keep up your fast-paced development on this. I foresee great things
happening with it!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Christia...@gmail.com on 8 Jul 2009 at 9:03

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I'm glad to hear that you think SVG-edit is usable.  I'm not sure I understand 
what
this Issue is about though.  Is it that you want us to dual-license the 
software?

I'm not sure that is even required since the Apache license is considered less
restrictive than the GPL.  I guess I need to do some more reading...

Original comment by codedr...@gmail.com on 8 Jul 2009 at 12:59

• Added labels: Type-Enhancement
• Removed labels: Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html

Original comment by codedr...@gmail.com on 8 Jul 2009 at 1:07

[GoogleCodeExporter]

No. I dont't think there are issues related to the license. i would just want 
to see
more plugins for other softwares included with your svg-edit distribution. as i
stated, i want to contribute the one for Fabrik

Original comment by Christia...@gmail.com on 8 Jul 2009 at 1:42

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes, I've been recently thinking along the lines that SVG-edit's svgcanvas can 
be
considered the base editor 'widget' and then a variety of projects might want to
use/adapt it:

  * the HTML editor 
  * Narendra's whiteboarding application
  * a Google Wave gadget
  * a slide-making app kind of like a quickie Powerpoint
  * etc

Each of these projects might only use some of the features of the svgcanvas.  
Each of
these projects might also provide some additional functionality to the 
svgcanvas that
we can consider rolling in to base functionality.

Not sure how it will all sort itself out eventually, but looking forward to your
contribution :)

Original comment by codedr...@gmail.com on 8 Jul 2009 at 1:49

[GoogleCodeExporter]

:) I was going to make the Google Wave too, but i guess i got beaten to it. 
please
add my email: ctzurcanu@yahoo.com

Original comment by Christia...@gmail.com on 8 Jul 2009 at 2:57

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Christian, can you clarify specifically what this Issue should entail?

Original comment by codedr...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2009 at 3:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

sure. this should be the page that opens the canvas-editing page (onto 
self-window or
in a pop-up) for any chosen HTML form element of type text or textarea. it 
should be
some sort of server-side (think PHP, Google appengine, ASP) that is able to 
access
the edited svg data and store it in a variable.
conversely, if the dataset is not empty, it should display the image 
(thumbnail) of
the SVG data with a little button next to it, for editing (related to
http://code.google.com/p/svg-edit/issues/detail?id=70&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status
%20Priority%20NeededFor%20Owner%20Summary)

Original comment by Christia...@gmail.com on 20 Aug 2009 at 5:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Looks like this issue is about telling you where it becomes used. :)

I have added it to the extension repository of MoinMoin wiki software. An 
example of
the current css layout is given at http://moinmo.in/ReimarBauer/SvgEditor 
Later on I plan to add it to moin-2.0. I have not followed your release cycles. 
Can
you give a rough idea for 2.4? 

By now it works great! (Besides the two issues I have to fix because of my 
changes)

I have added to the save approach a simple loading mechanism so that I can save 
and
load to a wiki attachment file, see issue 60.

cheers
Reimar

Original comment by rb.p...@gmail.com on 25 Aug 2009 at 6:24

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Going through the bugs today and I'm still confused on what this issue is for. 
Christian, can you clarify the specific goal and deliverable of this Issue?  
Then we
can modify the Summary so that it is clear.

If this is not an actionable issue, I would like to just mark it as Invalid.

Thanks,
Jeff

Original comment by codedr...@gmail.com on 17 Sep 2009 at 3:19

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by codedr...@gmail.com on 23 Sep 2009 at 3:38

• Changed state: NeedsInfo

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Marking as invalid since no response for over a month.  Can always re-open if 
this
issue is clarified with clear requirements on a deliverable.

Original comment by codedr...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2009 at 5:47

• Changed state: Invalid