Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Interesting suggestion.
However, i'm not quite seeing the problem. Say you want to see Dark Knight at
8pm (in 10009). You go to
Dark Knight (since that's what you want to see) and you start scrolling down
the list. You get to check your
favorite theaters first to see if they have times that work for you. They
don't, so you scroll a bit further. You
hen see the AMC empire 25 is playing.
I dislike the 'favorites' button as well. "i marked it as a favorite. now i
have to tell you to tell me about it?"
Distance seems to naturally be a way to order (since most people would like a
closer theater for a particular
time than one that's further away).
If i allow sorting by time then you could have this problem:
It's 5:45 pm. You ask to sort by time and get:
Movie at 5:50, 50 miles away
Movie at 5:55, 40 miles away
Movie at 6:00, 30 miles away
Movie at 6:05, 20 miles away
Movie at 6:10, 10 miles away
Movie at 6:15, 5 miles away
In all likelyhood, the person would want to go to the one at 6:15 that's 5
miles away.
Heck, with driving distances, they likely would not be able to even make the
starting times for many of the the
theaters. So in order to deal with a 'sort by time', distance would *have* to
be considered in order to judge if
they could actually make the theater or not.
It all sounds too complicated. vs now where you can quickly scan your theaters
in an increasing radius from
you to decide if any are best. This allows you to make the determination
between starting time/distance as it
makes sense to you.
Original comment by cyrus.na...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2008 at 8:15
My guess is that you live in a small city, Cyrus. You're biggest customer base
is
going to be in big cities, in which case the list you provide above would be
more like:
Movie at 5:50, 9 miles away
Movie at 6:15, 4 miles away
Movie at 6:25, 1 miles away
Movie at 6:45, 8 miles away *favorite*
Movie at 7:00, 6 miles away
Movie at 7:15, 5 miles away *favorite*
If you don't believe me, try a big release like The Dark Knight in Seattle. But
even
for smaller releases, there are typically three theaters playing the same movie
in a
10 if not 5 mile radius.
> So in order to deal with a 'sort by time', distance would *have* to be
considered
in order to judge if they could actually make the theater or not.
Sure, I thought about that. And you may be right that it isn't worth it, though
it's
not that complicated to factor in a conservative driving time, say 30 mph. But
even
if you don't include Time, as I point out in bug 68, a distance list should be a
distance list, and pushing favorites to the top breaks that.
Original comment by brownsug...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2008 at 8:41
I live in Manhattan.
Original comment by cyrus.na...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2008 at 8:45
So, using your numbers... i'm not seeing why the current set up is undesirable.
You first check your two favorite theaters, and see that it's pretty long from
now. So you then see the theater
playing it at 6:25 that's 1 mile away. Right off the bat you'll likely go see
that. If you're *really* earnestly
wanting to see it earlier, you'll look to the next theater, note that it's at a
slightly better time, and probably
can be driven to, and you make the decision if time/distance is worth it.
"as I point out in bug 68, a distance list should be a distance list"
I don't accept that as an axiom.
"and pushing favorites to the top breaks that. "
I don't accept that necessarily either.
Cheers!
Original comment by cyrus.na...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2008 at 8:50
Note: living in a big city *highly* exacerbates this problem.
Manhattan has *112* theaters (at least in my data feed). If you order by time,
then you see a *lot* of theaters
show up on any 5/10/15 minute interval, *most* of which are completely
inappropriate and useless to the user.
"Great, there are 25 theaters playing this in the next hour... but which ones
are actually close to me?"
Original comment by cyrus.na...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2008 at 8:54
> You first check your two favorite theaters, and see that it's pretty long
from now.
So you then see the theater playing it at 6:25 that's 1 mile away. Right off the
bat you'll likely go see that.
But you can't. The showtimes on movie pages doesn't show distance information
other
than the ordering. I have know idea its 1 mile away, especially if I'm visiting
Manhattan and am only familiar with the few theaters that are my favorites if
any at
all.
> Manhattan has *112* theaters (at least in my data feed). If you order by
time,
then you see a *lot* of theaters show up on any 5/10/15 minute interval, *most*
of
which are completely inappropriate and useless to the user.
Not if you are only showing the times for a single movie, and include only those
closer or are favorites. You're thinking this is all too complicated, but
that's the
kind of movie app that's going to become number one -- one that intelligently
aids
the user. From your own examples... search algorithms incorporate ranking and
relevancy algorithms, not hard coded top results (Current Location is a very
special
case). If you use firefox play with typing items in the location bar --
favorites are
not always on top.
Original comment by brownsug...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2008 at 9:40
"But you can't. The showtimes on movie pages doesn't show distance information
other
than the ordering. I have know idea its 1 mile away, especially if I'm visiting
Manhattan and am only familiar with the few theaters that are my favorites if
any at
all. "
That's a good point. I'll add something in the UI to indicate how far away the
theater is.
Original comment by cyrus.na...@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2008 at 2:30
"Not if you are only showing the times for a single movie, and include only
those
closer or are favorites. "
Yes. Even then.
Only showing favorites is not beneficial. The user already sees the favorites
at the top.
I'm not sure what "include those closer" means.
In Manhattan i see a wealth of theaters that are unhelpful to me if i sort by
time.
Original comment by cyrus.na...@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2008 at 2:32
"You're thinking this is all too complicated, but that's the
kind of movie app that's going to become number one"
that's not an answer. saying "being complicated is ok" doesn't actually help.
I need an actual *methodology*
that will produce useful results. So far that has not been provided. I've
already mentioned the issues i have with
the offered solutions.
Cheers!
Original comment by cyrus.na...@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2008 at 2:33
This is my thought on a simple solution for this issue:
1. In the Movies Menu, provide an option "Timing" next to Release, Title, Score.
2. Navigating to this tab will list upcoming movie timings for the current day
till
midnight in an sort order of timing ascending for all the nearby theaters set
for the
zipcode in the settings section.
3. When a user selects a time, list movies playing at that time
4. User selects the movie
5. User picks a theater and purchases the ticket for that time, else selects a
different time.
As simple as it gets.. :)
Original comment by niftyh...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2008 at 4:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
brownsug...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2008 at 8:02