Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Try -demuxer lavf, that fixed it for me.
Original comment by stevo3...@gmail.com
on 18 Oct 2008 at 7:11
I tried your suggestion but what happened was that mplayer started reading the
file
and quickly consumed all my memory and swap space.
Original comment by allan.mi...@zetnet.co.uk
on 21 Oct 2008 at 12:58
can you get it to work at all using ffh264? even if it is really slow, it
would be
helpful to know whether this is a demuxer or codec problem.
Original comment by alannis...@gmail.com
on 21 Oct 2008 at 7:02
using r74 dshowserver, svn 27809 mplayer, 1.8.5 coreavc on a 32 bit Gentoo
install:
1. with -vc coreserve I get the original reported problem
1. plays OK (other than jerkiness) with -vc ffh264
2. if I specify -demuxer lavf with/without ffh264 I get this memory consumption
(The disk I am playing is blueray Stargate)
Original comment by allan.mi...@zetnet.co.uk
on 22 Oct 2008 at 11:49
Sorry, I wasn't clear. If you use '-demuxer lavf -vc ffh264' do you get the
memory
consumption issue?
The problem in teh original ticket is that teh default demuxer doesn't provide
enough
info for CoreAVC to run. This is basically a 'WontFix' because there is
nothing I
can do about it. So the hope is to find a demuxer that does provide enough
info to
CoreAVC that actually works with the stream. IN general, the lavf demuxer does
provide the right info, but it may not work with all inputs.
You might just give up and try xine. Xine seems to do a better job with its
demuxer
providing the right headers without overrides than mplayer does.
Original comment by alannis...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2008 at 1:22
Yes, I get the memory consumption with lavf and ffh264.
Thanks for explaining what the problem was.
Xine won't/can't handle m2ts files, it comes back with a message saying there
is no
demuxer plugin available for that file type. I am using xine-lib-1.1.15, should
I be
using the 1.2 branch?
Original comment by allan.mi...@zetnet.co.uk
on 22 Oct 2008 at 6:36
Original comment by alannis...@gmail.com
on 12 Mar 2010 at 4:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
allan.mi...@zetnet.co.uk
on 19 Aug 2008 at 1:28