Open Lillian-21 opened 2 years ago
I guess this one is not a haploid genome. I recommend you check a few duplicate genes to see if they are real.
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, we also doubted with the ploidy. Becuase the contigs is too fragment , I only can plot the synteny comparison with two gene sets. From the results, we can find obvious duplication.
This is likely to be polyploid, and the three peaks have an obvious fold relationship.
Thanks. Yes, I think so it is a polyploid (triploidy? ) now. I drawed the haplotype structure with heterozygous kmer pairs by Smudgeplots, the results show clear triploidy. And I also have a try to anchor the hifiasm's results to chromosomes with HIC reads, but the results were not ideal. It's obviously to find two parts, and I also don't know what the white area (without anchor? ) is between the two parts.
Whatever, I want to get a high quality haploid assembly results. Could all of you give me some suggestions?
Hi,
Thanks for you nice hifiasm!
I have a haploid plant sample (wu just guess from previous researches and experience). The WGS estimatics size is ~2.1G with the first kmer peak, the hifi data estimatics size is ~500Mb by genoscope2 with ploidy 2. The kmer frequency results are as follows.
So, it is so confusing about the genome size and ploidy. Could you give me some advise?
I have test many times with different parameters, including with "-l0" or not, with hic data or not, modify -s -D, but all the results are fragment, incomplete and high depetition. The following id my assembly results (*p_ctg.fa) and log files.
hifasm.sh.e531543.txt hifasm.sh.e1188977.txt
How can I improve my assembly? and should I use the "-l0" or not? Looking forward with your reply. Best wishes!