Thank you very much for developing this amazing tool!
Recently, I have tried to run hifiasm (v0.16.1) on CCS reads that subsampled to different coverage with rasusa, and noticed that the difference between hap1 and hap2's N50 got larger when reads were subsampled (assembly evaluated with Quast). Is this an expected behavior? Or this could be caused by the subsampling tool (rasusa)?
Hi,
Thank you very much for developing this amazing tool!
Recently, I have tried to run hifiasm (v0.16.1) on CCS reads that subsampled to different coverage with rasusa, and noticed that the difference between hap1 and hap2's N50 got larger when reads were subsampled (assembly evaluated with Quast). Is this an expected behavior? Or this could be caused by the subsampling tool (rasusa)?
Original reads (~56x NA24385 CCS) assembly N50: hap1: 67990447 hap2: 55015309
subsampled to 50x: hap1: 80331069 hap2: 48577680
40x: hap1: 61310474 hap2: 38985709
30x: hap1: 50351921 hap2: 33726358
20x: hap1: 11535826 hap2: 6595624
for 50x~20x, seems that the N50 of hap2 are around 60% of hap1 N50
the command used to run hifiasm was
hifiasm -o NA24385.asm -t32 ${reads}
Thank you Best