Closed apurtell closed 7 years ago
FYI @busbey @JamesRTaylor
Thanks for taking a look at this Andrew!
Which flume artifacts? We're supposed to publish everything, so that sounds like a bug.
For tephra, for the last labs packaging I rebuilt against CDH jars and that worked. I believe I already filed a JIRA against them for the issue, but rebuilding again should work.
@busbey I saw the POM change you made for Tephra/CDH. That was for 0.7, Phoenix 4.8 needs 0.8.0-incubating. Tephra ships with a CDH compat module for HBase 1.0, not the newer stuff based on 1.2. Also, that labs version of Tephra is not publically available
As for flume, whatever is defined in the parent pom for 5.8.0 as cdh.flume.version. 0.9.4 something or other as I recall. Build failed unable to pull it from maven central or Cloudera artifactory. So I searched maven for something public, found 1.6.0, and used it.
Hurm. The tephra repo was supposed to get published when the Phoenix one did. I'll figure out what happened. FWIW, it was just the vanilla 1.2 compat module with the versions changed. It's source compatible for CDH, just not binary. My guess is tephra 0.8.0's 1.2 module is the same.
No 1.2 compat module for tephra in maven central: http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ctephra . They have them for 0.96, 0.98, 1.0, 1.0-cdh, and 1.1.
No compat module was required for 1.2 - the 1.1 compat module is fine for 1.2
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Andrew Purtell notifications@github.com wrote:
No 1.2 compat module for tephra in maven central: http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ctephra . They have them for 0.96, 0.98, 1.0, 1.0-cdh, and 1.1.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/chiastic-security/phoenix-for-cloudera/issues/7#issuecomment-238117969, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF4-K3bweTC3hovCAE3xscl8o0KPpOaiks5qdnOVgaJpZM4JemkT .
Then we need a 1.1-CDH @JamesRTaylor @busbey because the 1.1 compat module is not compatible with CDH. Errors from OperationWithAttributes for one.
Agreed, Andy.
Maybe that's what https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-176 will be?
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Andrew Purtell notifications@github.com wrote:
Then we need a 1.1-CDH @JamesRTaylor https://github.com/JamesRTaylor @busbey https://github.com/busbey because the 1.1 compat module is not compatible with CDH. Errors from OperationWithAttributes for one.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/chiastic-security/phoenix-for-cloudera/issues/7#issuecomment-238118223, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF4-K8W8UOQSqZmQhtuZzjm2V5Zn631Oks5qdnSSgaJpZM4JemkT .
Did you mean @Poorna @JamesRTaylor ?
@poornachandra (https://github.com/poornachandra)
FYI, I've filed an internal ticket to get the modified tephra repo published.
For the flume-ng-core artifact, can you try wiping out the local repo and refetching? Browsing the repository, at least, things look to be present (ref flume-ng-core:1.6.0-cdh5.8.0).
I don't think it helps with needing tephra-incubating 4.8 support, but I got the modified tephra 0.7 published to the cloudera-labs repo
I don't think it helps with needing tephra-incubating 4.8 support, but I got the modified tephra 0.7 published to the cloudera-labs repo
Thanks Sean. You're right, but it does mean the 4.7 labs release can be reproduced publicly now, which is great.
Agreed. Thanks, Sean!
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Purtell notifications@github.com wrote:
I don't think it helps with needing tephra-incubating 4.8 support, but I got the modified tephra 0.7 published to the cloudera-labs repo
Thanks Sean. You're right, but it does mean the 4.7 labs release can be reproduced publicly now, which is great.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/chiastic-security/phoenix-for-cloudera/issues/7#issuecomment-238643040, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF4-K71wMNK6_n0wO9k5LJVBikwT6p6Fks5qeMSWgaJpZM4JemkT .
Did this get created/completed? I'm a little lost on where this topic ended up at.
Hi @apurtell , this 4.8-HBase-1.2-cdh5.8 branch will supports for CDHv5.8 and HBasev1.2 for phoenix? Can I build and use the phoenix server/client jars in production?
Please help.
I'm trying to build a new parcel from this branch (4.8-HBase-1.2-cdh5.8).
There are any command to generate a new parcel?
I just saw instructions here https://github.com/cloudera/cm_ext/wiki/Building-a-parcel and the spark-assembly module from this repo.
Any idea?
Is this stable enough for production use? I'm a bit worried about this. Especially since Cloudera seems to have abandoned their cloudera labs parcel.
We have a branch for 4.9 that doesn't have these issues. Use that
I pushed preliminary work (based on 4.8.0 RC2) to https://github.com/chiastic-security/phoenix-for-cloudera/tree/4.8-HBase-1.2-cdh5.8
Issues
Anyway, it's possible to build binary artifacts minus the Hive integration:
Spark tests look good.
Highly doubtful the flume integration will work, of course.