Closed l0g1x closed 8 years ago
I think the second is better as we dont have to 'calibrate' the covariance on different frictional surfaces
The visual slam works based on feature detection, correct? And if so, wouldn't that possibly introduce error in odom calculations?
Yes it does, but you can also think of it as using landmark observations on a very small time change level , which will give us a point of reference as to the velocity we are turning at visually. Ill explain more on thursday
Ive been thinking for a while now on how we can estimate (better) the rotational position/velocity done by the robot, and i had a few ideas:
Thoughts on this?