Closed michplunkett closed 7 months ago
It was between the bar and line chart:
The line chart doesn't give a good side-by-side comparison, so I THINK I'm gonna roll with the bar. The changes aren't significant between each year, but I think there's something to seeing the overall composition of the field each year.
Gonna make some mods to this tonight.
Would it be possible to break up the "other" category further? It seems a bit weird to have an "other" category like that when it's so large compared to the "black" category. Also, if possible, you should add a key showing what the three colors mean. Finally, if possible, it might help to make the visuals narrower and taller to accentuate the differences between the bars so they don't all look so similar.
The other
category consists of about 5-10 categories that range from visible to very small, this is also how the NCAA presents it. I could give it a shot tho. With regard to the key, I've always been a bit hesitant to use them. I feel like it adds a lot of clutter to the charts that is no longer needed once you scroll over them. With regard to the width of the bars, they are going to be modified so that they compare to the overall NCAA percentages, like this: https://jsfiddle.net/api/post/library/pure/
We can get the demographics grouped beyond white, black, and other in the overall population of NCAA athletes, but not for each individual sport, unluckly.
Ready for review, @Nik4002 and @Asteinhart. Running them by Finn as well.
What does this PR do?
Add NCAA demographic information for men's and women's cross country from 2014 to 2023.
How was the functionality tested and verified?
All steps should be completed in the order presented, and you should not move on to the next step until the previous is completed.
html
page is the same as the chart.meta_data.json
file is filled in correctly (the description is a complete sentence, the title is the same as the visual).npm run process-visual
command.