Open davidsulc opened 13 years ago
Confirmed this is an issue in 6.1.4:
get_relationships doesn't return custom fields even when you ask for them specifically. I added a custom field (pet_name_c) to the Accounts module, then asked for that field via get_relationships...
get_relationships: Request:
{
"session": "3a236a4d73824a27b6b2f78301ff0a04",
"module_name": "Contacts",
"module_id": "2f470762-3bf9-3583-0613-4da250c06ab4",
"link_field_name": "accounts",
"related_module_query": "",
"related_fields": ["shipping_address_street_4","rating","phone_alternate","name","invalid_email","email_opt_out","shipping_address_state","phone_fax","campaign_id","ticker_symbol","phone_office","parent_name","date_modified","billing_address_state","billing_address_city","modified_user_id","id","email1","deleted","created_by","billing_address_street_2","account_type","shipping_address_country","ownership","created_by_name","campaign_name","billing_address_street_3","website","parent_id","modified_by_name","employees","billing_address_street_4","assigned_user_name","description","date_entered","assigned_user_id","annual_revenue","sic_code","shipping_address_street_2","shipping_address_street","shipping_address_postalcode","shipping_address_city","billing_address_street","billing_address_postalcode","billing_address_country","shipping_address_street_3","pet_name_c","industry"],
"related_module_link_name_to_fields_array": [],
"deleted": 0
}
get_relationships: JSON Response:
{"entry_list"=>
[{"name_value_list"=>
{"name"=>{"name"=>"name", "value"=>"King Software Inc"},
"shipping_address_state"=>
{"name"=>"shipping_address_state", "value"=>"CA"},
"billing_address_city"=>
{"name"=>"billing_address_city", "value"=>"Cupertino"},
"billing_address_state"=>
{"name"=>"billing_address_state", "value"=>"CA"},
"date_modified"=>
{"name"=>"date_modified", "value"=>"2011-04-11 00:56:50"},
"phone_office"=>{"name"=>"phone_office", "value"=>"(464) 165-2225"},
"account_type"=>{"name"=>"account_type", "value"=>"Customer"},
"created_by"=>{"name"=>"created_by", "value"=>"1"},
"deleted"=>{"name"=>"deleted", "value"=>"0"},
"id"=>{"name"=>"id", "value"=>"20076df3-ac96-22bd-4014-4da250310c76"},
"modified_user_id"=>{"name"=>"modified_user_id", "value"=>"1"},
"shipping_address_country"=>
{"name"=>"shipping_address_country", "value"=>"USA"},
"created_by_name"=>
{"name"=>"created_by_name", "value"=>"Charles Administrator"},
"website"=>{"name"=>"website", "value"=>"www.qakid.biz"},
"modified_by_name"=>
{"name"=>"modified_by_name", "value"=>"Charles Administrator"},
"assigned_user_name"=>
{"name"=>"assigned_user_name", "value"=>"Sally Bronsen"},
"assigned_user_id"=>
{"name"=>"assigned_user_id", "value"=>"seed_sally_id"},
"date_entered"=>{"name"=>"date_entered", "value"=>"2011-04-11 00:51:54"},
"billing_address_country"=>
{"name"=>"billing_address_country", "value"=>"USA"},
"billing_address_postalcode"=>
{"name"=>"billing_address_postalcode", "value"=>"70840"},
"billing_address_street"=>
{"name"=>"billing_address_street", "value"=>"48920 San Carlos Ave"},
"shipping_address_city"=>
{"name"=>"shipping_address_city", "value"=>"Cupertino"},
"shipping_address_postalcode"=>
{"name"=>"shipping_address_postalcode", "value"=>"70840"},
"shipping_address_street"=>
{"name"=>"shipping_address_street", "value"=>"48920 San Carlos Ave"},
"industry"=>{"name"=>"industry", "value"=>"Chemicals"}},
"id"=>"20076df3-ac96-22bd-4014-4da250310c76",
"module_name"=>"Accounts"}],
"relationship_list"=>[]}
I'll have to check at work where I have 5.5 installed, but I'm pretty sure it returns custom fields.
Are you running 5.5.0 or 5.5.1? I can try it as well.
I can't recall. I'll have to check tomorrow...
Filed bug 43342 for this one.
I can confirm that this is a regression: it works correctly on 5.5.1RC2 (Build 1175)
Git bisect for the win !
Hah, awesome... I'll update the bug.
I have submitted a case to sugar for them to fix this. We are a gold partner so they are going to take a look at this for us on Tuesday (US time). Will let you know when it's fixed.
Neat. Can you let them know that SugarCRM bug 43342 is probably a duplicate (meaning they can close it at the same time) ?
Hi, I just thought I'd let you know that I've finally got a work around for this, until the sugar devs fix it.
In data/SugarBean.php at around line 3037, the following line exists: $custom_join = $this->custom_fields->getJOIN( empty($filter)? true: $filter );
In sugar 5.5, the line is: $custom_join = $this->custom_fields->getJOIN( true );
So if you change it to the same line as 5.5 then custom fields will be returned once again.
If your bug isn't fixed, you can probably submit this as a pull request to SugarCRM CE!
Ahh OK. I don't think they're interested though, it was one of the sugar officials who got back to me about this, so they know about it. Will assume that the devs will fix it, at least that's the impression I got.
(Edit: filed as SugarCRM bug 43342)
To reproduce:
If the same opportunity is retrieved directly, the field is returned properly (with the corresponding value).
It seems the issue comes from get_relationships: the case_number_c field isn't included in the response. (As I recall, it was properly returned in 5.5).
Chicks, can you confirm?
(This bug will have to be filed with SugarCRM, I wanted to confirm first.)