Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Lieber Musikliebhaber,
we discussed this issue already in issue #6.
the clicks are NOT produced by sacd_ripper, but result from dsd to pcm
conversion. When you play your dff files on a pcm audio equipment (like the
soundcard of your computer), the playing software does a dsd to pcm conversion.
This conversion process is mainly a heavy lowpass filtering, called decimation,
which produces transient responses at the beginning and at the end of each
conversion process. So these clicks are artifacts from dsd to pcm conversion.
I recommend to extract a DSDIFF Edit Master File with CUE sheet, convert the
whole DSD-Image to PCM with a software of your choice (foobar2000,
Audiogate...). Then cut your PCM-Image into single tracks using the CUE sheet.
PM me, if you have questions.
yours, t.
Original comment by thom...@gmx.net
on 15 Jan 2012 at 11:05
[deleted comment]
Agreed.
However, this procedure is quite cumbersome. It would be really great if a
future version of SACD_Extract could do direct-to-wav/flac output and
automatically take care of this problem. Is this possible?
Original comment by lich000k...@yahoo.de
on 16 Jan 2012 at 7:36
>It would be really great if a future version of SACD_Extract could do
direct-to-wav/flac output and automatically take care of this problem. Is this
possible?
It is possible to output PCM. But the PCM conversion itself is just not that
'simple'. For ex. to do it properly gain should be calculated in advance (after
1st stage conversion). And last but not least the DSD to PCM algorithm is very
complicated to get right. Saracon does a very good job with its aliasing
filter, it would be very hard to get that similar kind of quality.
Original comment by mr_wic...@hotmail.com
on 17 Jan 2012 at 9:11
Saracon supports batch processing. How about an option to output wav/flac using
Saracon? Maybe the DSD could be modified such that no clicks would appear.
If the clicks are indeed produced at junctions of different passages of
digital silence, these passages could be made equal.
Alternatively, silence could be added at the beginning and end of a track
before the conversion and removed again afterwards.
Original comment by lich000k...@yahoo.de
on 19 Jan 2012 at 5:19
As reported earlier and further investigation confirms this has to do with
nothing but the pcm conversion itself.
Original comment by mr_wic...@hotmail.com
on 3 Feb 2012 at 12:32
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
musiklie...@googlemail.com
on 9 Jan 2012 at 10:40