chimurai / http-proxy-middleware

:zap: The one-liner node.js http-proxy middleware for connect, express, next.js and more
MIT License
10.72k stars 834 forks source link

websocket proxy cannot upgrade websocket connection #112

Open desytech opened 8 years ago

desytech commented 8 years ago

Expected behavior

HPM should upgrade websocket requests always

Actual behavior

HPM websocket proxy cannot upgrade websocket connections sporadically

Setup

 devServer: {
      proxy: {
        '/hyperguard/websocket/*': {
          target: 'ws://localhost:8082',
        ws: true
        }
      }
    }

server mounting

def serve_forever(self):
    app = self.__make_app()
    self.__http_server = HTTPServer(app)
    self.__http_server._handle_connection = self._handle_connection
    self.__http_server.listen(self.__port, self.__host)
    app.ssl_enabled = self.__ssl_options is not None
    self.__ioloop.start()

Howto Reproduce

http stream request

GET /hyperguard/websocket HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8079
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13
origin: http://localhost:8079
Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate
Sec-WebSocket-Key: yrOcNHCvvVuGgttYgv9nzA==
Connection: keep-alive, Upgrade
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
Upgrade: websocket

http stream response getting this response only sometimes, if not the websocket connection never be established

HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
upgrade: websocket
connection: Upgrade
sec-websocket-accept: I3u4B7iakSJWk4yLd02hfn+enus=
chimurai commented 8 years ago

Thanks for reporting.

Can you provide info on the websocket client(s) you are using. And the frequency of the upgrade requests?

_.debounce is used to solve an issue: #57. Maybe that explains the sporadic behaviour when concurrent upgrade requests are made.

https://github.com/chimurai/http-proxy-middleware/blob/0cb6839ed2121f7dc8685f31a1e18b5069eeb092/lib/index.js#L15

Can you try to remove the debounce code and see if it solves the issue?

From:

var wsUpgradeDebounced  = _.debounce(handleUpgrade);

To:

var wsUpgradeDebounced  = handleUpgrade;
desytech commented 8 years ago

We are using the websocket client implementation of Chrome(53.0.2785.116 m (64-bit)) and Firefox (47.0). Frequency: I try to establish only one connection on initialisation. Nothing changed on removing the debounce code.

chimurai commented 8 years ago

Just to confirm if the issue is related to HPM. Did you try to connect to the server directly? (without the proxy)

If is it HPM related; It can be either an issue in HPM configuration or a bug in HPM.

Try adding the option: changeOrigin: true Tornado might be refusing the request, since Host value in the request is different from the Tornado's host.

 devServer: {
      proxy: {
        '/hyperguard/websocket/*': {
          target: 'ws://localhost:8082',
          changeOrigin: true,
          ws: true
        }
      }
    }
desytech commented 8 years ago

Direct connection

I think the issue is related to HPM, because if i request a websocket upgrade directly it always works as expected.

request (without HPM)

GET /hyperguard/websocket HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8082
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br
Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13
Origin: https://localhost:8082
Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate
Sec-WebSocket-Key: 7XjMl4KmXDJa/TWfb7vabQ==
Connection: keep-alive, Upgrade
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
Upgrade: websocket

immediatlely response (without HPM)

HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
Upgrade: websocket
Connection: Upgrade
Sec-WebSocket-Accept: iC7Eh/cX6YgchA7mJQ950DWmIiQ=

Workaround

I figured out a way to reproduce a workaround with tornado + HPM + webpack-dev-server. If the problem occurs i just have to request the websocket proxy path via http e.g http://localhost:8079/hyperguard/websocket

response

HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
X-Powered-By: Express
Content-Length: 34
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:13:38 GMT
Server: TornadoServer/4.4.1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Connection: keep-alive

Can "Upgrade" only to "WebSocket".

If i go back to my working url e.g. http://localhost:8079 the websocket connection can be upgraded as expected.

Q&R

chimurai commented 8 years ago

Can you try setting your target with the http protocol:

target: 'http://localhost:8082'
desytech commented 8 years ago

Changing the protocol of the target option has no effect. I have to debug the issue in-depth. It cannot be excluded that the problem occures on tornados side.

chimurai commented 8 years ago

Think I've exhausted the common configurations. :)

FYI: HPM uses http-proxy to do the actual proxying. (https://github.com/nodejitsu/node-http-proxy) Worth checking to see if you'll get the same issue when you're just using http-proxy.

dansiviter commented 7 years ago

It looks like I get this with webpack-dev-server 1.16.2 also. I get this on the server:

[HPM] GET /websocket -> ws://localhost:8080/websocket
[HPM] Upgrading to WebSocket

Chrome reports:

(index):37 WebSocket connection to 'ws://127.0.0.1:8888/websocket' failed: Connection closed before receiving a handshake response

When using Fiddler it reports:

[Fiddler] ReadResponse() failed: The server did not return a complete response for this request. Server returned 0 bytes.

I'm using a similar config:

proxy: {
    '/websocket': {
        ws: true,
        target: 'ws://localhost:8080/websocket',
        logLevel: 'debug'
    }
}

One thing I do see which hasn't been reported before is nothing happens if I perform raw websocket connection on a cold start, it just hangs. I only get the above output if I first attempt a basic GET to http://127.0.0.1:8888/websocket first which appears to warm-up HPM. I have tried connecting directly to ws://localhost:8080/websocket and it does work, I've also tried changing ws:// to http:// to no avail.

The closest issue I've found in the http-proxy repo is nodejitsu/node-http-proxy#577 but it's really old. nodejitsu/node-http-proxy#891 might also be related. I've also raised this on StackOverflow.

SpaceK33z commented 7 years ago

@dansiviter, could you try to change your target to ws://localhost:8080? AFAIK the path /websocket already gets appended (unless you use the pathRewrite option).

dansiviter commented 7 years ago

Thanks, one step closer as that worked. However, I still need to warm up the connection with a GET before it'll connect. Any ideas?

For anyone who needs it my config is:

proxy: {
    '/websocket': {
        ws: true,
        target: 'http://localhost:8080'
    }
}

Which ultimately proxies to ws://localhost:8080/websocket so appending the path and changing the scheme automatically.

desytech commented 7 years ago

debugged that problem weeks ago rudimentary, it seems that the http proxy middleware which is applied to the express server never be executed. maybe a side effect with sockjs which is used to handle the hot realoading websocket channel.

dceddia commented 7 years ago

@dansiviter this SO answer might be helpful: http://stackoverflow.com/a/32943389/465887

I'm working on enabling websocket proxying in Create React App (https://github.com/facebookincubator/create-react-app/issues/1013) and it looks like I can manually watch for the "upgrade" request coming from the devServer, and then call HPM's "upgrade" function.

CRA is using HPM directly though, instead of the devServer.proxy config, so it might not apply to your use case, but this is the code I'm using to set it up (so far it seems to be working but I haven't tested thoroughly yet):

    // Pass the scope regex both to Express and to the middleware for proxying
    // of both HTTP and WebSockets to work without false positives.
    var hpm = httpProxyMiddleware(pathname => mayProxy.test(pathname), {
      target: proxy,
      logLevel: 'debug',
      onError: onProxyError(proxy),
      secure: false,
      changeOrigin: true,
      ws: true
    });
    devServer.use(mayProxy, hpm);

    devServer.listeningApp.on('upgrade', hpm.upgrade);
mixxen commented 7 years ago

I had problems with the proxy websocket closing right after connecting. Found out that socket io was closing unhandled requests. If you are using socket io, the fix is to set the destroyUpgrade option to false:

var express = require('express');
var app = express();
var http = require('http').Server(app);
var proxy = require('http-proxy-middleware');
var io = require('socket.io')(http, {destroyUpgrade: false});
dcartertwo commented 7 years ago

Also seeing this issue. @mixxen's fix seems to have worked for me.

torrejonv commented 3 years ago

Apologies for commenting on an ancient ticket, but I managed to hit this issue (ws proxy only starts working after manually performing a GET call).

app.use(
    '/ws/live',
    createProxyMiddleware({
        target: process.env.API,
        ws: true, // enable websocket proxy
        changeOrigin: true,
        logLevel : 'debug'
    })
);

... "http-proxy-middleware": "^1.0.6", "react": "^17.0.1", "react-scripts": "4.0.0", ....

I understand that no resolution was found, but does anyone know any workaround (better than manually doing a GET, I mean)?

adolgoff commented 3 years ago

Same here. AFAIU issue on the middleware happens if server is trying to send data socket which has already been closed, but I haven't dig it enough yet. I'll try to find more details, just wanted to underline that issue persists in some conditions.

limion commented 1 year ago

Got stuck with this issue in my CRA app. I have changed my setupProxy.js to the following and It looks like it's working for me:

app.use(
    '/',
    createProxyMiddleware('/ws', {
      target: process.env.API,
      changeOrigin: true,
      secure: false,
      ws: true,
    })
  );

So that the request to React App itself works as a "first manual GET" for the WebSocket (it actually registers the "upgrade" handler)

torrejonv commented 1 year ago

Got stuck with this issue in my CRA app. I have changed my setupProxy.js to the following and It looks like it's working for me:

app.use(
    '/',
    createProxyMiddleware('/ws', {
      target: process.env.API,
      changeOrigin: true,
      secure: false,
      ws: true,
    })
  );

So that the request to React App itself works as a "first manual GET" for the WebSocket.

I am not entirely sure how this works... but it does! Thank you for sharing this workaround!

limion commented 1 year ago

@torrejonv from my understanding it works like lazy loading. Until you make a request to the route where proxy middleware is registered there will be no "upgrade" handler added to the HTTP server. With this ☝️ approach, any request passes through the proxy middleware so that we have the "upgrade" handler registered from the very beginning.

torrejonv commented 1 year ago

@torrejonv from my understanding it works like lazy loading. Until you make a request to the route where proxy middleware is registered there will be no "upgrade" handler added to the HTTP server. With this ☝️ approach, any request passes through the proxy middleware so that we have the "upgrade" handler registered from the very beginning.

Thank you for the explanation. Very ingenious indeed!