Closed mnichols08 closed 3 weeks ago
I like this format but I am wondering if we can start with the feature and then the issue number?
Ex.
feat/3/add-do-something/de
I like this format but I am wondering if we can start with the feature and then the issue number? Ex.
feat/3/add-do-something/de
It should be a group decision Set Up a Team Workflow #9
I am not going to merge this for the sake of providing an example of what I believe to be an effective branch naming convention.
I find it is often really useful to lead your branch name with the "issue number" provided by GitHub when an issue is created.
<issue-number>/<issue-type>
Next by providing a/
(forward slash) followed by<issue-type>
we can specify what type of issue the branch is solving, followed by a<description-of-the-issue>
and finally another/
(forward slash) with username or initials as a means to distinguish the branch from others.This results in a branch naming convention that leaves branches following this template
<issue-number>/<issue-type>/<description-of-issue>/<user-initials>
This policy will make it easier to decipher what a branch consists of