Open unbtorsten opened 2 years ago
@unbtorsten - Yes, it would be good for this to be fixed. I believe some simplifications like this had already been done in prjuray?
GitHubDocumenting the Xilinx Ultrascale, Ultrascale+ and UltraScale MPSoC series bit-stream format. - GitHub - f4pga/prjuray: Documenting the Xilinx Ultrascale, Ultrascale+ and UltraScale MPSoC series bi...
GitHubContribute to SymbiFlow/prjuray-tools development by creating an account on GitHub.
According to https://github.com/f4pga/prjxray/issues/1384, this repo holds a standalone implementation of fasm2frames. However, prjxray still ships a copy of fasm2frames, e.g. at https://github.com/f4pga/prjxray/blob/master/utils/fasm2frames.py
What is the relationship between the script at prjxray and the one in this repo, i.e. https://github.com/SymbiFlow/f4pga-xc-fasm/blob/master/xc_fasm/fasm2frames.py? There have not been any updates of prjxray's
fasm2frames.py
since the inception of this repo, but how is this guaranteed as we move forward? Would it be an option to make this repo a submodule of prjxray?