| verilator | icarus
ERRORS | 0 | 1
SIM TIME | 500.00 NS | 5001000000000.00 NS
REAL TIME | 0.35 S | 0.01 S
SIM / REAL TIME | 1439.80 NS/S | 345734536080435.12 NS/S
The sim time differs and the error doesn't occurs with verilator.
axi_lite_slave sim time
axi_lite_slave example has different duration with different simulators (link):
| verilator | icarus
ERRORS | 0 | 0
SIM TIME | 1.31 NS | 1.26 NS
REAL TIME | 0.05 S | 0.04 S
SIM / REAL TIME | 27.24 NS/S | 35.84 NS/S
i'm surprised verilator has worse performance than icarus... is it right or is it just a bad performance estimation?
Hi,
I updated my tools and i found differences in the logging output:
Different time step
As is shown here, the events occur at different times. Maybe the
timescale 1ns/1ps
is missing or not interpreted.Error with icarus, success with veriltor
Running
dff
example, i get the following results:The sim time differs and the error doesn't occurs with verilator.
axi_lite_slave
sim timeaxi_lite_slave
example has different duration with different simulators (link):i'm surprised verilator has worse performance than icarus... is it right or is it just a bad performance estimation?