RFP - notesnook

[dnet890]

Checklist

• [x] The package I am requesting does not already exist on https://chocolatey.org/packages;
• [x] There is no open issue for this package;
• [x] The issue title starts with 'RFP - ';
• [x] The download URL is public and not locked behind a paywall / login;

Package Details

Software project URL :https://notesnook.com/downloads/#otherplatforms Direct download URL for the software / installer : https://notesnook.com/releases/windows/notesnook_x64.exe Software summary / short description: an encrypted note taking app

[github-actions[bot]]

Package Request Validation

We have finished some basic validation of this request. The result of this validation can be found below:

Everything looks good to our automated checks, it is now up to a human to validate the remaining steps. No action is required yet

New Maintainer Notices

This section details some parts of the request that any upcoming maintainer may need to take into consideration.

• File Validation Output

TrID/32 - File Identifier v2.24 - (C) 2003-16 By M.Pontello
Definitions found:  14870
Analyzing...

Collecting data from file: C:\Users\RUNNER~1\AppData\Local\Temp/software.tmp
 48.8% (.EXE) Win32 Executable MS Visual C++ (generic) (31206/45/13)
 16.4% (.EXE) Win64 Executable (generic) (10523/12/4)
 10.2% (.DLL) Win32 Dynamic Link Library (generic) (6578/25/2)
  7.8% (.EXE) Win16 NE executable (generic) (5038/12/1)
  7.0% (.EXE) Win32 Executable (generic) (4505/5/1)

Please note that this check is currently in alpha, and may not be able to detect everything correctly. Humans may also be able to detect other issues with this request.

[thecodrr]

Co founder of Notesnook here. @pauby what'll be required to push this further?

[pauby]

Co founder of Notesnook here. @pauby what'll be required to push this further?

Can you explain what you mean by 'push this'?

[thecodrr]

Hey, what I meant is that I'd like for notesnook to be installable through chocolatey. I read the readme and it seems a maintainer is required to take up the whole process. Can I take up the maintainance officially?

Also, it was not very clear about how & where to actually submit the packages. Can you clarify that a bit?

[pauby]

@thecodrr The package doesn't exist at the moment so from that aspect there is nothing to pick up. If you want to submit a package for this then please check out the documentation in the first instance.

If you let us know you'll be picking this up we can change the labels to indicate that.