chocolatey / package-validator

Windows service to validate packages conform to package standards
Apache License 2.0
31 stars 29 forks source link

gitlab-runner and foobar2000 failing URL #243

Closed majkinetor closed 3 years ago

majkinetor commented 4 years ago

Not sure why this package isnt passing validation, complains about invalid URLs which are valid

gep13 commented 4 years ago

@majkinetor thanks for raising this. Seems like this is related to this issue:

https://github.com/chocolatey/package-validator/issues/242

As they are both failing with the same exception.

chtof commented 4 years ago

https://chocolatey.org/packages/cudatext/1.111.5.0 https://chocolatey.org/packages/cudatext/1.111.5.3 https://chocolatey.org/packages/cudatext/1.111.6.0 https://chocolatey.org/packages/cudatext/1.112.0.0 https://chocolatey.org/packages/cudatext/1.112.1.0 https://chocolatey.org/packages/cudatext/1.113.0.0

The DocsUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. Please correct this More...

But the DocsUrl is valid: https://wiki.freepascal.org/CudaText

Another point: These 7 versions are in "Verification Testing Pending", so it seems Verification Testing for this package is blocked since the check of DocsUrl fails.

gep13 commented 4 years ago

@chtof I have re-ran all these package versions through the package-validator, and they are now correctly validating the URL's. They should now also flow into the package-verifier queue. Let me know if you are still having issues with them.

gep13 commented 3 years ago

@majkinetor apologies on taking so long to get to this.

This problem has been addressed, and the gitlab-runner package is now passing validation.

It seems as though the foobar package already got through.

gep13 commented 3 years ago

@chtof when I went to check, the cudatext packages were also passing correctly, so I don't think there is anything to do there.