Closed juliebehr closed 8 years ago
Was this an issue in the initial system setup or in the analysis end of things?
Found input pdbs -- no mutants
Ah, OK. We can always set up more runs.
I'm not sure how, then, to account for the apparent differences between the runs? Can I aggregate all the data for both projects and treat it as 250 clones of 1OL5 and 1OL7 WT?
Well, I guess this explains why there isn't significant difference in the averages: https://github.com/choderalab/AURKA_UMN/blob/fah-pdbs/plots/AURKA-hydrogen-bonds-11410-all-runs.png https://github.com/choderalab/AURKA_UMN/blob/fah-pdbs/plots/AURKA-hydrogen-bonds-11411-all-runs.png
I think you can go ahead and aggregate the data for both projects as you suggest.
I'd convert these plots into probability densities instead of numbers of trajectories.
Slight refactoring of the setup script and updating to pdbfixer-dev seems to have fixed this problem! Currently generating the new serialized XMLs on src -- first with the crystallographic waters still saved, next will remove them.
FaH projects 11412-11417
https://github.com/choderalab/AURKA_UMN/tree/fah-pdbs/fah-pdbs