Open jchodera opened 9 years ago
I've added the citation for the new Copernicus paper in the manuscript, alongside the citation to the earlier 2011 paper.
While useful, I suggest that the addition of a packaging stage for Copernicus would not add significant value to the manuscript, and it thus be considered low priority. If still wanted, we can add this as a feature request on the main Ensembler issue tracker.
Do you think that the paper and tool is too FAH-centric otherwise?
Would be useful to cite the new Copernicus paper as another example of how you can use ensembler-generated models.
In fact, it may be interesting to add a packaging stage for Copernicus.