Open kyleabeauchamp opened 9 years ago
For some reason, this function's docstring mentions to use an OEGraphMol, which I think might not be what we want?
https://github.com/choderalab/gaff2xml/blob/master/gaff2xml/openeye.py#L225
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Kyle Beauchamp notifications@github.com wrote:
So somewhere we are passing an OEGraphMol when we need a three-dimensional OEMol, leading to the following test failure:
kyleb@kyleb-DX4870:~$ nosetests gaff2xml -v Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs') ... ERROR Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs') ... ERROR
Testing drugs molecule_0 with charge method bcc ... ^C
ERROR: Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs')
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/loader.py", line 251, in generate for test in g(): File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/tests/test_drugs.py", line 26, in test_drugs molecule_name, tripos_mol2_filename = utils.molecule_to_mol2(molecule) File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/utils.py", line 418, in molecule_to_mol2 return gaff2xml.openeye.molecule_to_mol2(_args, *_kwargs) File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/openeye.py", line 253, in molecule_to_mol2 for k, mol in enumerate(molecule.GetConfs()): AttributeError: 'OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs' -------------------- >> begin captured logging << -------------------- gaff2xml.openeye: DEBUG: ZINC03873936 --------------------- >> end captured logging << ---------------------
ERROR: Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs')
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/loader.py", line 251, in generate for test in g(): File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/tests/test_drugs.py", line 36, in test_drug molecule_name, tripos_mol2_filename = utils.molecule_to_mol2(molecule) File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/utils.py", line 418, in molecule_to_mol2 return gaff2xml.openeye.molecule_to_mol2(_args, *_kwargs) File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/openeye.py", line 253, in molecule_to_mol2 for k, mol in enumerate(molecule.GetConfs()): AttributeError: 'OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs' -------------------- >> begin captured logging << -------------------- gaff2xml.openeye: DEBUG: ZINC03873936 --------------------- >> end captured logging << ---------------------
Ran 3 tests in 1.921s
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/gaff2xml/issues/79.
And this might be the source of the bug
https://github.com/choderalab/gaff2xml/blob/master/tests/test_drugs.py#L20
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Bas Rustenburg < bas.rustenburg@choderalab.org> wrote:
For some reason, this function's docstring mentions to use an OEGraphMol, which I think might not be what we want?
https://github.com/choderalab/gaff2xml/blob/master/gaff2xml/openeye.py#L225
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Kyle Beauchamp notifications@github.com wrote:
So somewhere we are passing an OEGraphMol when we need a three-dimensional OEMol, leading to the following test failure:
kyleb@kyleb-DX4870:~$ nosetests gaff2xml -v Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs') ... ERROR Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs') ... ERROR
Testing drugs molecule_0 with charge method bcc ... ^C
ERROR: Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs')
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/loader.py", line 251, in generate for test in g(): File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/tests/test_drugs.py", line 26, in test_drugs molecule_name, tripos_mol2_filename = utils.molecule_to_mol2(molecule) File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/utils.py", line 418, in molecule_to_mol2 return gaff2xml.openeye.molecule_to_mol2(_args, *_kwargs) File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/openeye.py", line 253, in molecule_to_mol2 for k, mol in enumerate(molecule.GetConfs()): AttributeError: 'OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs' -------------------- >> begin captured logging << -------------------- gaff2xml.openeye: DEBUG: ZINC03873936 --------------------- >> end captured logging << ---------------------
ERROR: Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs')
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/loader.py", line 251, in generate for test in g(): File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/tests/test_drugs.py", line 36, in test_drug molecule_name, tripos_mol2_filename = utils.molecule_to_mol2(molecule) File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/utils.py", line 418, in molecule_to_mol2 return gaff2xml.openeye.molecule_to_mol2(_args, *_kwargs) File "/home/kyleb/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gaff2xml-0.1-py2.7.egg/gaff2xml/openeye.py", line 253, in molecule_to_mol2 for k, mol in enumerate(molecule.GetConfs()): AttributeError: 'OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs' -------------------- >> begin captured logging << -------------------- gaff2xml.openeye: DEBUG: ZINC03873936 --------------------- >> end captured logging << ---------------------
Ran 3 tests in 1.921s
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/gaff2xml/issues/79.
I just ran into this issue too (trying to start using gaff2xml in order to hopefully increase overlap between what my lab is doing and what you are doing). Is there a fix in the works? Should I try and fix it? My recollection is that an OEGraphMol is by necessity single conformation so it has no function GetConfs.
What are you specifically trying to do?
E.g. if this is FreeSolv related, I have a script here (https://github.com/choderalab/gbff/blob/master/code/rebuild_freesolv.py) that does a lot of the things we might want to do...
Just run the tests, at this point. :) Non-critical, but I assumed initially (until I read this) that I should be concerned if the tests can't run without error.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Kyle Beauchamp notifications@github.com wrote:
What are you specifically trying to do?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/gaff2xml/issues/79#issuecomment-97271881.
David Mobley dmobley@gmail.com 949-385-2436
Yes, I just found that. And I'm about to e-mail to kick off a somewhat larger discussion.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Kyle Beauchamp notifications@github.com wrote:
E.g. if this is FreeSolv related, I have a script here ( https://github.com/choderalab/gbff/blob/master/code/rebuild_freesolv.py) that does a lot of the things we might want to do...
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/gaff2xml/issues/79#issuecomment-97272036.
David Mobley dmobley@gmail.com 949-385-2436
Did you want us to look into this issue? (i.e. ideally the tests should run without error.)
I still have the same issue running the nose tests on 0.6.5 which I just installed via conda. ("Failure: AttributeError ('OEGraphMol' object has no attribute 'GetConfs') ... ERROR") This is for 2-acetoxybenzoic acid.
What version of OpenEye are you using? I wonder if there's a difference between the versions.
Ah, it could be. I am in OEChem 20150211 (I did not upgrade to the latest beta yet). What are you using?
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Kyle Beauchamp notifications@github.com wrote:
What version of OpenEye are you using? I wonder if there's a difference between the versions.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/openmoltools/issues/79#issuecomment-97990600 .
David Mobley dmobley@gmail.com 949-385-2436
OpenEye-python2.7-ubuntu-14.04-x64-2015.2.3.tar.gz
Hmm, mine was installed via pip: pip install -i https://pypi.binstar.org/openeye/simple openeye
DM
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Kyle Beauchamp notifications@github.com wrote:
OpenEye-python2.7-ubuntu-14.04-x64-2015.2.3.tar.gz
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/openmoltools/issues/79#issuecomment-97995207 .
David Mobley dmobley@gmail.com 949-385-2436
FWIW, here is the output on my machine:
nosetests openmoltools -v --exe
[...]
Testing molecule benzene ... ok
Testing molecule toluene ... ok
Testing molecule phenol ... ok
Testing molecule benzene-1,2-diol ... ok
Testing molecule 2-acetoxybenzoic acid ... ok
Testing drugs ZINC03873936 ... ok
Testing drugs ZINC19632834 ... ok
Testing drugs ZINC03647770 ... ok
Testing drugs ZINC03815424 ... ok
[...]
Any chance you want to try this out with one of the pip/conda-installable OpenEye versions? I'd just as soon NOT go back to the "dark ages" way of installing just to see if it will work for me if I do. The alternative is to see if it breaks for you if you use the newer way of installing.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Kyle Beauchamp notifications@github.com wrote:
FWIW, here is the output on my machine:
nosetests openmoltools -v --exe
[...]
Testing molecule benzene ... ok Testing molecule toluene ... ok Testing molecule phenol ... ok Testing molecule benzene-1,2-diol ... ok Testing molecule 2-acetoxybenzoic acid ... ok Testing drugs ZINC03873936 ... ok Testing drugs ZINC19632834 ... ok Testing drugs ZINC03647770 ... ok Testing drugs ZINC03815424 ... ok [...]
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/openmoltools/issues/79#issuecomment-97998036 .
David Mobley dmobley@gmail.com 949-385-2436
Sure, I will try out the pip version
On 05/01/2015 11:56 AM, davidlmobley wrote:
Any chance you want to try this out with one of the pip/conda-installable OpenEye versions? I'd just as soon NOT go back to the "dark ages" way of installing just to see if it will work for me if I do. The alternative is to see if it breaks for you if you use the newer way of installing.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Kyle Beauchamp notifications@github.com wrote:
FWIW, here is the output on my machine:
nosetests openmoltools -v --exe
[...]
Testing molecule benzene ... ok Testing molecule toluene ... ok Testing molecule phenol ... ok Testing molecule benzene-1,2-diol ... ok Testing molecule 2-acetoxybenzoic acid ... ok Testing drugs ZINC03873936 ... ok Testing drugs ZINC19632834 ... ok Testing drugs ZINC03647770 ... ok Testing drugs ZINC03815424 ... ok [...]
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/choderalab/openmoltools/issues/79#issuecomment-97998036 .
David Mobley dmobley@gmail.com 949-385-2436
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/openmoltools/issues/79#issuecomment-98164430.
I can also take a stab at getting this to work on travis. We got info from OpenEye on how to get this to work by grabbing the license file via HTTP. I think we just have to host our group license file somewhere that isn't google indexed or linked to.
John D. Chodera Assistant Faculty Member, Computational Biology Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center email: j choderaj@mskcc.orgohn.chodera@choderalab.org office: 646.888.3400 fax: 510.280.3760 mobile: 415.867.7384 url: http://www.choderalab.org
Actually, that seems insufficiently insecure. Will consult with OpenEye further.
Yes, I can't imagine how you could get that to work without making the URL of your license file public. It may require them rethinking how they handle licensing to a limited extent (i.e. maybe they can allow X number of OE tool calls without a license within 24 hours?).
David
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:11 AM, John Chodera notifications@github.com wrote:
Actually, that seems insufficiently insecure. Will consult with OpenEye further.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/choderalab/openmoltools/issues/79#issuecomment-98167999 .
David Mobley dmobley@gmail.com 949-385-2436
So somewhere we are passing an OEGraphMol when we need a three-dimensional OEMol, leading to the following test failure: