Open jmichel80 opened 2 years ago
@Lnaden , you know this stuff better than me. Though I would encourage trying to go to version 4 - there's a lot of robustness/features added!
@mrshirts I wonder if there is any plan for pymbar>=4 to support Linux/aarch64 and osx-arm64? Given that we now have pymbar-core, which shall be able to live happily in these two archs.
So, I don't think we will be supporting pymbar < 4. The goal is to shift to 4>= so that we are not maintaining old functionality. @jmichel80, if there are issues with pymbar 4 that make it difficult to use, let us know so we can try to address them. In terms of the architecture; I'm not sure of the issues on the installation. Presumably the non-jit version should be fine on whatever architecture?
Sorry, my fault. I noticed now that both pymbar and pymbar-core do support Linux/aarch64.
Dear pymbar developers,
Is there a plan to support linux-aarch64 packages on conda-forge for pymbar (preferably <4) ?
Best wishes,
Julien