Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Ok, the actual expected output is
function() { // override
var previous = this.base;
this.base = ancestor;
var returnValue = method.apply(this, arguments);
this.base = previous;
return returnValue;
};
but that's not really the point. ;)
Original comment by scott.mi...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2007 at 1:21
Bind methods will be different for different browsers as each browser has a
different
inheritance path depending on which features the browser has missing.
I don't really consider this a bug.
Original comment by dean.edw...@gmail.com
on 1 May 2007 at 8:10
Changed to "WontFix" (see my previous comment).
Original comment by dean.edw...@gmail.com
on 1 May 2007 at 8:11
Presumably,
event.target = event.srcElement;
is supposed to fire on IE, but it doesn't.
That's the point of the bug report. One of us is missing something. :)
Original comment by scott.mi...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2007 at 1:36
> One of us is missing something.
OK. The penny the penny has dropped for me. I now see the problem. :-)
Unfortunately
I don't have a copy of Vista. Can you supply your UA string please?
I'll reopen the bug...
Original comment by dean.edw...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2007 at 3:26
I'm sorry that the original bug report was so obtuse. I started with "hey, IE
event
fix isn't working" and ended up so drilled into your code that my but report
was
ultra-technical.
Fwiw, this @ rule is working well:
"@MSIE.+win": {
bind: function(event) {
It's just that the special code in Binding for overriding 'bind' isn't allowing
this
version of bind to be mixed into Event, as described above.
Here is the UA string you asked for:
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
.NET
CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Original comment by scott.mi...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2007 at 9:50
I think this is now fixed. Can someone test it for me? Preferably Scott. :-)
Original comment by dean.edw...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2007 at 7:23
This is now fixed.
Original comment by dean.edw...@gmail.com
on 3 Jul 2007 at 8:36
Original comment by doek...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2007 at 6:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
scott.mi...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2007 at 1:00