Closed JessG1981 closed 7 months ago
PS if it makes any difference - the target data sample size is less than 20 (I know, it is very small)
The r2 calculation is
1 - (1 - full) / (1 - null)
Sam
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:12 PM JessG1981 @.***> wrote:
PS if it makes any difference - the target data sample size is less than 20 (I know, it is very small)
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/choishingwan/PRSice/issues/356#issuecomment-2077876533, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJTRYV4QYK4ZOFTS6CSBCDY7FBRDAVCNFSM6AAAAABGZCQ77WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANZXHA3TMNJTGM . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Thank you very much! That makes sense now.
Hi,
I have run my data through PRSice-v2 to generate polygenic indices and have an issue with the output for the best-fit model. It looks like this:
PRS.R2: 0.195985 Full.R2: 0.867389 Null.R2: 0.835064
To me this doesn't make sense, as I thought that Full.R2 = PRS.R2 + Null.R2, but in these figures, the PRS.R2 + Null.R2 = 0.195985 + 0.835064 = 1.031049...
Please can anyone help explain what could be wrong with this?
This is the code that I used:
The phenotype is a continuous variable.
Thanks in advance!
Jess